Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.10.13.758739

Decoding CBM2 binding modes: how similar folds achieve distinct substrate preferences

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms underlying substrate recognition and selectivity is essential for developing new biotechnological applications of carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs). Many members of CBM family 2 (CBM2) prefer binding to crystalline substrates and show diverse substrate specificities despite sharing similar folds. We show here that CBM2 specificity cannot be rationalized solely based on sequence and fold. Rather, specific binding of CBM2s to crystalline surfaces depends on a balance of topological complementarity, hydrophobic dehydration, and hydrogen-bonding interactions. We compare the binding modes of ScCBM2 and BaCBM2 on cellulose, chitin, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with respect to protein and substrate properties. Using MD simulations and NMR, we explore the CBMs' surface topology, hydration, solvent accessibility, and electrostatics. The results indicate that the two CBMs may bind to crystalline substrates in opposite orientations, and that the interplay between hydrophobic and {pi}-stacking interactions along the aromatic triad and hydrogen-bonding interactions on either side determines their orientation. We further show that higher water density at the aromatic triad correlates with higher substrate affinity. Lastly, we probe the interaction dynamics of BaCBM2 with PET nanoparticles and the monomer bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET) using NMR relaxation and solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (sPRE) experiments, revealing a mixture of transient, low-population states involved in PET binding. These insights clarify the interplay among factors that drive CBM2 substrate recognition and highlight the importance of evaluating surface hydration and protein dynamics in future CBM2 studies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hansen Trooyen, S., Rennison, A. P., Dahlgren, T., Fojan, P., Moller, M. S., Courtade, G.. 2026-10-16. Decoding CBM2 binding modes: how similar folds achieve distinct substrate preferences. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.13.758739

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Cancers relax selection on charge at the mitochondrial complex I quinone cavity

Mitochondrial complex I translocates protons through hydrated channels whose connectivity and electrostatics are both defined by structure, but whether they are distinctly constrained is unknown. From a 2.39 cryo-EM structure modelling 2,945 ordered waters, we built the proton wire of the seven mtDNA-encoded ND subunits and scored all 40,166 missense substitutions on two near-orthogonal axes (r = 0.17): electrostatic shift at proton-loading sites, and topological disruption of the wire. Across 858 germline variant sites, loading sites (0.51) and cut vertices (0.67) are both depleted. In tumours only loading sites are enriched (1.42 TCGA, 1.67 PCAWG, 1.29 MSK-IMPACT), a 3.06-fold difference tested as a wire class tissue-type interaction (P = 3.6 10-). It survives adjustment for conservation, burial and coverage, and is concentrated in ND1 within 15 of the quinone cavity, not spread along the proton path. Selection separates charge from connectivity, without establishing a fitness benefit.

biophysics↗

Rugnux: from diffraction images to structure at synchrotrons and XFELs in one program

Rising data rates in macromolecular crystallography outpace multi-program pipelines on computing clusters. Rugnux, a single GPU-accelerated program, turns rotation or serial still diffraction images into merged data and an initial structure. At synchrotrons, results arrive seconds after the last image; on one workstation, 207 public datasets from 36 sources took a median of 15 s each, with deposition-quality. Serial XFEL data were processed faster than the collection rate, enabling real-time structure determination.

biophysics↗

Phase Separation of Intracellular Proteins Influences Synaptic Bistability

Synaptic bistability at the post synaptic density has been proposed to be the result of the nucleation and evaporation of receptor clusters. The exact biophysical mechanism underlying these inter-receptor attractions that can trigger nucleation remains to be elucidated. Emerging evidence demonstrates that numerous postsynaptic density submembrane proteins, that interact with various membrane receptors, can undergo phase separation, necessitating a revised conceptual model. By employing Langevin dynamics simulations of coarse-grained scaffold proteins and interacting membrane receptors, we study how phase transitions of scaffold proteins alter receptor clustering at the membrane. In our model, scaffold macromolecules can undergo phase separation and interact with receptor molecules at the model membranes. We observed that the presence of scaffold polymers across the membrane creates an attractive interaction between otherwise purely repulsive receptors. By systematically varying the number of receptors at the membrane, we dissected the coupling between receptor clustering and the phase behavior of scaffold macromolecules. We show that the propensity for receptor clustering is enhanced by the condensation of scaffold proteins. We then used two different scaffolds and systematically varied the interaction between them, to change the spatial organization of two condensed phases w.r.t. one another. Interestingly, we observed that receptor clustering can be reduced by co-phase separation of scaffold macromolecules, indicating the role of competing interactions in receptor clustering. Our work advances understanding of receptor-mediated signaling and phase separation, providing insights into cellular compartmentalization and biochemical regulation at the synapse.

biophysics↗