Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.10.13.758713

DCAF: Unifying Data Validity, Evaluation Validity and Predictive Modeling for Single-cell Perturbation Simulation

Abstract

Single-cell perturbation profiling is limited by cost and throughput, while computational methods remain constrained by inconsistent evaluation and underperformance relative to simple baselines. Here we present DCAF, a unified framework for single-cell perturbation simulation that that jointly addresses data validity, evaluation validity and predictive modeling. Among its three components, DCAF-data addresses the single-measurement limitation by reconstructing pre- and post-perturbation status using entropy-regularized optimal transport, and is demonstrated on both cell line and multi-cell type datasets. DCAF-criterion evaluates log fold changes in non-silenced genes to improve sensitivity to model error and robustness to zero inflation noise, validated on synthetic datasets. DCAF-model combines JEPA with explicit modeling for regulatory-dynamics modeling for interpretable prediction. Across benchmarks, DCAF outperforms state-of-the-art deep-learning methods, as well as mean and linear baselines in cross-gene, cross-cell-type and cross-region generalization. In adult Mouse brain, DCAF recapitulates known cell-type-specific regulatory heterogeneity of Dgcr8 knockdown at both cell type and gene levels. DCAF thus provides a rigorous and biologically grounded foundation for reliable perturbation simulation across development, disease and therapeutic discovery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xia, T., Lei, C., Chen, N., Hou, H., Zhang, H., Qin, H., Wang, D., Li, Q., Zhang, Y., Fang, S., Li, Y.. 2026-10-19. DCAF: Unifying Data Validity, Evaluation Validity and Predictive Modeling for Single-cell Perturbation Simulation. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.13.758713

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Carrier-Limited Release Risk in Electrospun Nanofibers for Regenerative Endodontics: Constraint Discovery from 25 Formulations

Regenerative endodontics needs an intracanal carrier that keeps disinfecting across a dressing interval that clinicians schedule at one to four weeks, without harming the stem cells that rebuild the pulp. We ask what one completed 25-formulation electrospinning campaign of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) fibers carrying metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, minocycline and Ca(OH)2 can decide, and use machine learning for constraint discovery and decision support rather than as a new predictor. After an audit against the source thesis, logistic regression predicts fine-fiber formation at 96% leave-one-out accuracy, but a one-threshold rule does as well, the gain over the 80% majority baseline is not significant (exact McNemar p = 0.125), and accuracy falls to 84% when mixture loading is encoded per component. Diameter models interpolate within formulation families (ridge MAE 193 nm, 95% CI 96 to 317 nm) and fail across them (R^2 < 0). Because the campaign never measured release, we assemble a same-drug, cross-carrier evidence table: 17 bounded metronidazole and ciprofloxacin observations from seven studies, with two-sided censoring. Water-soluble carriers (PVP, PVA) completed release within 80 h (PVP within 8 h); no water-insoluble monolithic carrier reached 90% within its observation window, releasing 1.5 to 50%; both within-study comparisons separate at matched loading; and blend, core-shell and thick-mat architectures released over 3 to 28 days. The PVP mats therefore carry a carrier-limited release risk, not a proven ceiling, and one dissolution experiment can confirm or overturn it. A censoring-aware screen keeps three necessarily and one possibly nondominated formulation, and fixed-budget replays show that uncertainty sampling finds failed formulations sooner, except the one it is confidently wrong about.

bioinformatics↗

CellMethMarker provides an integrated database of human cell- and tissue-type-specific DNA methylation markers

Cell- and tissue-type-specific DNA methylation markers provide epigenetic signatures of cellular identity and are widely used to infer cellular origin from bulk and single-cell methylomes. Existing resources mainly emphasize disease-associated biomarkers, methylome atlases, genomic annotations or RNA-based cell markers, leaving an unmet need for an integrated region-level resource dedicated to such markers. Here we present CellMethMarker (http://gu-zhanglab.hfcas.ac.cn/CellMethMarker), a curated database integrating 347,514 de novo markers derived from uniformly processed whole-genome and reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing datasets, 2,203,507 literature-derived marker records and harmonized metadata for 2,810 samples. CellMethMarker enables cell- and tissue-centered marker retrieval, coordinate-based search, genome-browser visualization, interactive methylation analysis and data download. In an independent single-cell methylome atlas, these markers recover the expected cell-type-associated methylation patterns, and a platform-matched reference built from them lowers the mean deconvolution error from 0.365 to 0.144. CellMethMarker therefore links region-level DNA methylation variation to cellular identity and supports methylome-based cell-type annotation and deconvolution.

bioinformatics↗

IG-28 enables identification and quantification of high-confidence isoforms from large bulk and single-cell full-length cDNA datasets

The technology to sequence full-length transcriptomes from bulk and single-cell samples has rapidly advanced. As a result, full-length cDNA datasets now reach billions of reads in size which is beyond the capability of most established isoform identification tools. Here, we introduce IG-28 which addresses this challenge with its capability to process and analyze large fl-cDNA datasets fast and using minimal computational resources. In contrast to its predecessor Mandalorion, IG-28 is not limited to bulk fl-cDNA but is capable of parsing, processing, and analyzing single-cell fl-cDNA datasets. It does so in a lightweight, flexible manner, integrating seamlessly with established scRNA-seq analysis workflows. We benchmarked IG-28 against a variety of established and new isoform identification tools using several bulk and a complex single-cell fl-cDNA dataset and found that IG-28 consistently outperformed the other tools by identifying high-confidence public isoforms.

bioinformatics↗