Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.10.06.757125

Protein novelty, sequence similarity, and negative sampling controls reveal benchmark specific discrimination in protein protein interactionprediction

Abstract

Protein protein interaction (PPI) predictors are often evaluated with random pair splits that permit proteins to recur across training and test sets, while constructed negative pairs can introduce a separate source of benchmark-specific signal. We reassessed the Guo yeast benchmark using a matched protein novelty curve, independently generated MMseqs2 sequence cluster controlled R3 variants, topology only controls, degree- and length matched putative negatives, handcrafted and frozen protein language model representations, multiple model configurations, seed analyses, and connected component aware inference. In the matched R1[->]R2[->]R3 comparison, AAC+CTD-MLP ROC-AUC declined from 0.697 for seen-seen pairs to 0.626 for one-unseen pairs and 0.587 for both-unseen pairs. Across independently regenerated cluster-disjoint R3 variants at 50%, 40%, 30%, and 20% MMseqs2 clustering thresholds, performance showed no consistent monotonic trend. Guo original-negative endpoints had lower positive-network degree than positive endpoints (mean 3.34 versus 6.72), and a degree-only logistic model reached ROC-AUC 0.962 on the original negatives but 0.502 on degree-matched negatives. We used degree-matched negatives consistently for R3 training and testing; six sequence based model configurations yielded ROC-AUC 0.493- 0.547; none showed corrected connected-component-aware evidence of above-chance discrimination. A PIPR multispecies analysis reproduced degree-associated label separation but also exposed cross-species pairing as an additional pooled cue. These results show that protein novelty, operational sequence cluster separation, and negative-set topology are distinct dimensions of PPI benchmark evaluation. The Guo result is benchmark-specific and should not be generalized to sequence-based PPI prediction or protein language models overall. The dataset and source code for the experiments are publicly available at https://github.com/morufwork/guoAudit.git.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adeagbo, M. A., Agbaje, H. A., Silveira, S. A.. 2026-10-14. Protein novelty, sequence similarity, and negative sampling controls reveal benchmark specific discrimination in protein protein interactionprediction. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.06.757125

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Carrier-Limited Release Risk in Electrospun Nanofibers for Regenerative Endodontics: Constraint Discovery from 25 Formulations

Regenerative endodontics needs an intracanal carrier that keeps disinfecting across a dressing interval that clinicians schedule at one to four weeks, without harming the stem cells that rebuild the pulp. We ask what one completed 25-formulation electrospinning campaign of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) fibers carrying metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, minocycline and Ca(OH)2 can decide, and use machine learning for constraint discovery and decision support rather than as a new predictor. After an audit against the source thesis, logistic regression predicts fine-fiber formation at 96% leave-one-out accuracy, but a one-threshold rule does as well, the gain over the 80% majority baseline is not significant (exact McNemar p = 0.125), and accuracy falls to 84% when mixture loading is encoded per component. Diameter models interpolate within formulation families (ridge MAE 193 nm, 95% CI 96 to 317 nm) and fail across them (R^2 < 0). Because the campaign never measured release, we assemble a same-drug, cross-carrier evidence table: 17 bounded metronidazole and ciprofloxacin observations from seven studies, with two-sided censoring. Water-soluble carriers (PVP, PVA) completed release within 80 h (PVP within 8 h); no water-insoluble monolithic carrier reached 90% within its observation window, releasing 1.5 to 50%; both within-study comparisons separate at matched loading; and blend, core-shell and thick-mat architectures released over 3 to 28 days. The PVP mats therefore carry a carrier-limited release risk, not a proven ceiling, and one dissolution experiment can confirm or overturn it. A censoring-aware screen keeps three necessarily and one possibly nondominated formulation, and fixed-budget replays show that uncertainty sampling finds failed formulations sooner, except the one it is confidently wrong about.

bioinformatics↗

CellMethMarker provides an integrated database of human cell- and tissue-type-specific DNA methylation markers

Cell- and tissue-type-specific DNA methylation markers provide epigenetic signatures of cellular identity and are widely used to infer cellular origin from bulk and single-cell methylomes. Existing resources mainly emphasize disease-associated biomarkers, methylome atlases, genomic annotations or RNA-based cell markers, leaving an unmet need for an integrated region-level resource dedicated to such markers. Here we present CellMethMarker (http://gu-zhanglab.hfcas.ac.cn/CellMethMarker), a curated database integrating 347,514 de novo markers derived from uniformly processed whole-genome and reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing datasets, 2,203,507 literature-derived marker records and harmonized metadata for 2,810 samples. CellMethMarker enables cell- and tissue-centered marker retrieval, coordinate-based search, genome-browser visualization, interactive methylation analysis and data download. In an independent single-cell methylome atlas, these markers recover the expected cell-type-associated methylation patterns, and a platform-matched reference built from them lowers the mean deconvolution error from 0.365 to 0.144. CellMethMarker therefore links region-level DNA methylation variation to cellular identity and supports methylome-based cell-type annotation and deconvolution.

bioinformatics↗

IG-28 enables identification and quantification of high-confidence isoforms from large bulk and single-cell full-length cDNA datasets

The technology to sequence full-length transcriptomes from bulk and single-cell samples has rapidly advanced. As a result, full-length cDNA datasets now reach billions of reads in size which is beyond the capability of most established isoform identification tools. Here, we introduce IG-28 which addresses this challenge with its capability to process and analyze large fl-cDNA datasets fast and using minimal computational resources. In contrast to its predecessor Mandalorion, IG-28 is not limited to bulk fl-cDNA but is capable of parsing, processing, and analyzing single-cell fl-cDNA datasets. It does so in a lightweight, flexible manner, integrating seamlessly with established scRNA-seq analysis workflows. We benchmarked IG-28 against a variety of established and new isoform identification tools using several bulk and a complex single-cell fl-cDNA dataset and found that IG-28 consistently outperformed the other tools by identifying high-confidence public isoforms.

bioinformatics↗