AI-Based Comparison of UniProt annotations and Literature Across Human Kinases

Pei, J.; Cong, Q.; Zhang, J.; Grishin, N. V.

doi:10.64898/2026.09.23.753935

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.09.23.753935

AI-Based Comparison of UniProt annotations and Literature Across Human Kinases

Pei, J.·Cong, Q.·Zhang, J.·Grishin, N. V.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Curated protein records and their supporting publications organize biological evidence at different levels of detail. Here, we used AI to independently answer a set of biological questions using either UniProt records or the full texts of the literature cited by those records, and then used AI-based evaluation to compare the resulting answers in terms of information coverage and semantic agreement. Fifty human proteins were selected from ten groups in a kinase sequence collection. Target-identity filtering retained 1,749 protein-publication records representing 1,655 distinct publications. For each protein, an AI language model generated one answer set from UniProt and another from the associated literature. A separate AI-based semantic evaluation compared all 2,500 pairwise combinations of the 50 UniProt-derived and 50 literature-derived answer sets, producing 87,500 question-level comparisons. Literature provided answers to 1,211 of 1,750 protein-question combinations, compared with 1,151 for UniProt. After correction for multiple testing across the 35 questions, literature coverage was significantly higher for autoinhibition and inhibitor type. Mean AI-assigned semantic agreement scores were higher for matched protein pairs (0.692) than for unmatched proteins within the same kinase group (0.384) and for proteins from different kinase groups (0.279). The matching literature-derived answer set ranked first for 49 of the 50 UniProt-derived queries, even after questions about gene symbol and kinase family were excluded. The sole exception was GUCY2C, whose UniProt-derived answer set showed slightly greater agreement with the NPR2 literature-derived answer set than with the GUCY2C literature-derived set. TYR proteins had the greatest overall answer coverage, whereas CK1 and RGC proteins had comparatively limited coverage in UniProt and the literature, respectively. Overall, AI analysis showed that UniProt records and their cited publications contain complementary yet strongly protein-specific biological information. Reporting gaps, question scope, and score aggregation influenced apparent agreement, underscoring that the framework evaluates consistency between AI-derived answers, not their biological accuracy.

Explore related subjects

bioinformatics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Pei, J., Cong, Q., Zhang, J., Grishin, N. V.. 2026-09-29. AI-Based Comparison of UniProt annotations and Literature Across Human Kinases. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.23.753935

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

The Almond Expression Atlas: A comprehensive multi-tissue transcriptomic resource for almond gene expression

Background: Improving crop adaptation and enhancing agronomic and quality traits requires a deeper understanding of gene expression regulation, for which expression atlases are valuable tools. Almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb) is one of the most economically important tree nut crops worldwide. However, an integrated transcriptomic resource for this species is still lacking. Available data remain fragmented across independent studies, limiting their comparability and reuse. Results: Here, we present the first almond gene expression atlas: a comprehensive multi-tissue transcriptomic resource integrating publicly available RNA sequencing data. A total of 142 high-quality untreated and control samples from 17 independent projects were curated through a metadata standardization process and analyzed using a unified bioinformatics pipeline. Standardized expression profiles were generated for 25,225 annotated genes in the Prunus dulcis Texas v2.0 reference genome. The atlas integrates two complementary expression approaches: a median TPM approach capturing quantitative expression levels and a rank-based strategy implemented using the Bgee expression calling method, designed to improve comparability across heterogeneous datasets. This design enables the identification of tissue-specific candidate genes and the exploration of expression patterns across tissues and developmental stages. Its applicability is demonstrated through two use cases, highlighting its ability to identify biologically meaningful gene sets associated with bud dormancy transitions and to prioritize candidate reference genes for RT-qPCR normalization in almond. Conclusions: The Almond Expression Atlas v1.0 is publicly available through FruitDBase (fruitdbase.csic.es), providing an interactive platform for gene expression exploration and visualization. This resource supports functional genomics studies and facilitates candidate gene discovery in almond, while ensuring data traceability and promoting data reusability.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

Leakage-Controlled Benchmarking of Variant Effect Predictors and Development of Gradient-Boosting Consensus Model

Single amino acid mutations are among the most common forms of genetic variation, with effects ranging from negligible to severe disruption of protein function. Accurate quantitative evaluation of protein variants therefore represents a key challenge in medicine and protein engineering. Computational variant effect predictors (VEPs) are widely used to prioritize missense variants, yet their fair comparison is hindered by data circularity, benchmarks restricted to human clinical annotations, and limited availability of code and training data, all of which can inflate apparent performance. Here, we reviewed 18 recent and 3 older, widely adopted variant effect predictors for reproducible benchmarking and assembled a rigorously curated, leakage-controlled Benchmark dataset by integrating clinically annotated human variants from ClinVar and Humsavar as well as cross-species variants with functional annotations. The evaluation on this dataset revealed a narrow overall performance range for the benchmarked tools (AUC 0.631-0.758) and a consistent drop from clinical to functional data. Surprisingly, several tools published two decades ago demonstrated comparable performance to mid-ranked modern predictors. Building on these results, we developed a gradient-boosting consensus model, PredictSNPprot, which achieved an AUC of 0.82 on a held-out test set, outperforming the original PredictSNP meta-predictor and the best individual state-of-the-art tool by 13.6 and 5.7 percentage points, respectively. The Benchmark dataset, including the predictions from the evaluated tools, is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23597130 and PredictSNPprot consensus predictor is available at https://github.com/loschmidt/PredictSNPprot.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

MaCADEMIA: a software toolbox for single-molecule fluorescence image quantification

Single-molecule localisation microscopy (SMLM) is a powerful tool in molecular and cellular biology and part of the broad umbrella of super-resolution microscopy. A distinct feature of SMLM, is its capacity for deep quantification, beyond just spatial information, to copy number, stoichiometry, molecular interaction and dynamics in living cells. The hardware required is increasingly straightforward to implement. However, complexity remains in the image analysis where much remains fragmented across specialised software tools. Here, we present MaCADEMIA (Matlab Computational Analysis of Diffusion, Emitter Molecular Intensity and Abundance), a simple yet powerful toolbox of MATLAB functions and associated documentation to enable straightforward extraction of quantitative single-molecule information. MaCADEMIA performs ensemble particle detection achieving localisation accuracies down to 0.5 pixels Root mean squared error (RMSE) across wide signal-to-noise (SNR) ranges on standardised particle tracking benchmarks, consistently matching or exceeding the performance of 14 leading methods. Our integrated workflow enables molecular counting and stoichiometry determination through stepwise photobleaching analysis, mobility measurement via mean squared displacement, colocalisaton analysis and absolute protein copy number quantification using three-dimensional cellular models.

bioinformatics↗