Active Escape or Active Change? Decomposing Pavlovian Bias into Non-emotional Components

Abstract

Pavlovian bias, a motor bias driven by emotionally-valenced context, has long been considered a proxy for emotion-action processing, which may become aberrant in affective disorders and suicidality. The orthogonal valenced Go/NoGo paradigm was developed to isolate this bias and has been widely adopted in translational psychiatry research under this interpretation. However, several unresolved theoretical inconsistencies highlight the need to dissociate potential confounding factors within this paradigm before assigning mechanistic and clinical interpretations to its findings. Using a novel paradigm that fully orthogonalized valence, action, and aimed transition in a normative sample of 25 individuals, we found that the "active escape bias" previously observed in aversive contexts--and interpreted as reflecting suicidality in the clinical population--was reproduced in appetitive contexts using trials with the same transition structure. Furthermore, computational modeling indicated that the bias patterns isolated by the orthogonal paradigm are primarily explained by the combined effects of aimed transition and cue salience, without requiring emotional-valence modulation. These findings call for a fundamental reconsideration of how orthogonal Go/NoGo paradigms are interpreted in translational psychiatry, particularly how the behavior they isolate is mechanistically linked to affective symptoms.