Social inequity aversion and fairness preference in polar bears

Abstract

Decision-making is key to survival, with choices and behaviour typically shaped by evolutionary pressures to enhance fitness and minimize loss. Inequity aversion, the tendency to respond negatively to unequal reward distributions, is therefore unexpected, as acts of fairness may be costly to the individual in the short term. In social, cooperative species, however, fairness may enhance long-term benefits through stable social interactions. Inequity aversion is believed to promote cooperative social structures and has only been demonstrated in certain social species. Yet, solitary species have not been tested, and whether this behaviour depends on social cooperative structures is unknown. Examining solitary species could clarify whether inequity aversion reflects an adaptation to cooperation or a general cognitive capacity linked to social comparison and reward evaluation. We studied inequity aversion in polar bears (Ursus maritimus), a largely solitary species, using three complementary, non-invasive cognition tests on seven bears from two zoos in the Netherlands. (1) An impunity experiment assessing effort-based inequity, in which bears performed a standardized action to obtain food rewards. (2) A choice-based experiment testing active selection between equal and unequal reward distributions. (3) A no-task control experiment assessing responses to unequal reward distribution without effort. Under effort-based inequity, bears reduced task performance and increased task latency when a partner received a superior reward. Unequal reward distributions did not affect reward acceptance independent of effort. In the choice-based paradigm, bears preferentially selected equal reward distributions with a partner present. Although generalizability to wild populations is limited, these findings demonstrate behavioural aversion of social inequity in a non-cooperative species. Inequality aversion may therefore not be restricted to social, cooperative animals but instead reflect a broadly distributed cognitive mechanism that emerges under relevant social conditions. These findings challenge current theories and advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of fairness-related behaviour in animals.