DLL3 expression predicts response and long-term outcome in small cell lung cancer patients treated with tarlatamab

Abstract

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (hgNEC) with poor prognosis. Tarlatamab, a DLL3-targeting T cell engager was approved in 2024 for relapsed SCLC, with almost doubled overall survival benefit compared to chemotherapy. However, over half of patients do not respond to tarlatamab and others develop resistance within months. With multiple DLL3-targeting therapies in clinical trials, there are currently no validated predictive biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from tarlatamab. In this study, we evaluate baseline DLL3 IHC level in patients as a predictive biomarker to tarlatamab clinical outcome. Methods: We assembled a cohort of 138 patients within IRB-approved MD Anderson GEMINI database (PA13-0589) with DLL3 expression by CLIA-validated immunohistochemistry (IHC), and those treated with tarlatamab from 7/1/2024 to 3/30/2026. Only those with DLL3 IHC results and treated with tarlatamab were included in this predictive biomarker study. All DLL3 levels were reported as percentage cells with cytoplasmic or surface DLL3 expression, including 24 with additional intensity score and H-score calculation. demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. Systemic and intracranial response data were assessed by RECIST and mRANO BM criteria respectively. Longitudinal liquid biopsies were taken from a subset of patients for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and (Cytometry by Time-of-Flight) CyTOF analyses. Results: In the predictive biomarker cohort of 54 patients with SCLC treated with tarlatamab, Median DLL3% level in tarlatamab treated cohort was 75%. Median follow-up time was 9.9 months, median time on tarlatamab treatment (ToT) was 5.8 months. At the data cut-off, 61% (33 out of 54) patients were alive. Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by DLL3 % of <=75% vs. >75 showed significant longer ToT and a trend toward longer median OS (mOS). In DLL3>75% compared to DLL3 <=75%: mToT was 10.1 months vs. 2.9 months (p=0.036), mOS: not reached vs. 9.5 months (p= 0.066). Among 41 patients who completed one cycle of tarlatamab treatment and were eligible for systemic (extra-cranial) response per RECIST criteria; we observed partial response (PR) in 51% (21) patients, stable disease (SD) in 22% (9) patients; and progressive disease (PD) in 27% (11) patients. The median DLL3 % in those with PR vs. PD were 80% vs. 40% (p=0.006); median DLL3% comparing PR and SD were 80% vs. 60% (p=0.051). Among 35 patients evaluable for intracranial response, best objective response prior to any brain radiation were 5 (14%) CR,11(31%) PR, 8 (23%) SD and 11 (31%) PD. 9 received brain radiation (8 SRS, 1 WBRT) during tarlatamab to achieve better intracranial control while systemic control is maintained. DLL3% does not appear to be correlated with intracranial response. Longitudinal ctDNA and CyTOF analyses showed persistent ctDNA positivity, as well as increasing NEUROD1 subtype cells in circulating tumor cells in post-tarlatamab progression samples. We additionally profiled DLL3 expression by IHC in 138 patients with SCLC and found heterogenous DLL3 expression, with Median DLL3% of 70% across different biopsy sites. Conclusions: Our data suggests DLL3 expression in patients with SCLC is heterogeneous and not ubiquitous, with median DLL3 IHC of 70%. DLL3 IHC predicts objective response and long-term outcome with tarlatamab. In addition, dynamic monitoring of ctDNA level and CTCs by CyTOF are suggestive of development of tarlatamab resistance, however further studies with larger cohort of paired longitudinal samples are needed to validate the novel blood-based biomarkers. To our knowledge, this study is the first to validate DLL3 IHC as a predictive biomarker for tarlatamab in SCLC, which leads the way for optimizing treatment selection and combinatorial therapies for the subset of patients less likely to respond to tarlatamab.