What do satellite vegetation indices actually measure? Photosynthetic capacity rather than transient physiological function across 328 global FLUXNET sites

Abstract

A direct empirical relationship between gross primary productivity (GPP) estimated by the eddy covariance method and satellite vegetation indices (VIs) has been widely observed across diverse ecosystems globally. Building on this observed covariation, VIs are frequently utilized as critical parameters - such as the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) - within light use efficiency (LUE) and greenness-based models for carbon cycle monitoring. However, actual canopy carbon assimilation is jointly governed by slowly evolving structural parameters and highly dynamic functional traits, such as physiological efficiency. The extent to which the macro-scale VI-GPP covariance is driven by structural scaffolding, and how this structural signal decouples from physiological function under environmental stress, remains to be systematically quantified. Here, we synthesized half-hourly eddy covariance measurements from 328 globally distributed sites and paired them with a rigorously angle-normalized Enhanced Vegetation Index (nadir view and fixed solar zenith angle at 30 degrees, EVI_SZA30). By applying a nonlinear light-response curve model across 54,720 high-frequency temporal windows, we mechanistically disentangled observed actual GPP (GPP_EC) into baseline photosynthetic capacity (P_c) and intrinsic quantum yield (alpha). Our results demonstrate that the macroscopic covariance between EVI_SZA30 and GPP_EC (R^2=0.554) is primarily driven by the index's robust ability to track structural capacity (P_c, R^2=0.538). In contrast, EVI_SZA30 exhibits limited sensitivity to high-frequency variations in functional traits like physiological efficiency (alpha, R^2=0.038). Particularly in water-limited biomes (e.g., open shrublands and woody savannas), intense environmental stress triggers rapid stomatal regulation while the physical canopy structure remains relatively stable. Consequently, the correlation between EVI and P_c becomes notably stronger than its correlation with actual GPP_EC, highlighting a pronounced structural-physiological decoupling. Because discrete overpasses by sun-synchronous polar-orbiting satellites face intrinsic temporal constraints in capturing sub-daily physiological down-regulation (e.g., midday photosynthetic depression), future monitoring paradigms could greatly benefit from the continuous, high-frequency observations provided by next-generation geostationary (GEO) satellites to bridge the gap between structural parameters and transient ecosystem function.