Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.08.16.745109

Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor B1 and its Interactions with Human Leukocyte Antigens

Abstract

Interactions between Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) molecules and their cognate immunoreceptors are essential for regulating innate and adaptive immune cell functions. Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-like Receptors (LILRs) are key regulators of HLA-mediated immune responses, owing to their broad expression across immune cell populations and their ability to modulate both immune activation and tolerance. Among these, LILRB1-HLA interactions are increasingly recognised as important in transplantation, chronic infection and cancer therapies. Unlike other HLA-binding receptors, which recognise epitopes specific to HLA subsets, LILRB1 primarily engages the relatively conserved 3 and {beta}2-microglobulin components of HLA molecules, supporting its role as a broad regulator of pan-HLA class I-mediated functions. Nonetheless, there have been conflicting findings regarding the breadth of LILRB1-HLA-I interactions. While direct affinity studies on a limited subset of HLA-I molecules have revealed no significant differences in LILRB1 binding, broader analyses using single-antigen bead arrays suggest underlying variability. Here, we show through a broad binding assay that, while LILRB1 is a broad HLA-I-binding receptor, it exhibits differential preferences across HLA-I allotypes. Molecular dynamics analyses of the HLA-I-LILRB1 interface suggest that HLA-3 domain dynamism underlies these binding differences. We further determined the crystal structure of LILRB1 and used it to highlight intrinsic structural flexibility within its domains. Finally, these structural insights were leveraged to refine our understanding of the binding modalities of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies currently described. Together, our findings establish structural and mechanistic bases for differential HLA-I recognition by LILRB1 and provide insights into immunotherapeutic targeting of LILRB1.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhang, G. X. Y., Truong, J. Q., Sullivan, L., Lake, M., Emery, T., Roest, J., Ovens, A. J., Khabib, M. N. H., Cao, M., Turner, B. R., Barrow, A. D., Holien, J. K., Vivian, J. P., Langendorf, C. G.. 2026-08-20. Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor B1 and its Interactions with Human Leukocyte Antigens. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.16.745109

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Common viral infections seed regionally distinct resident memory T cells in the human CNS

T cells persist in the central nervous system (CNS) and can drive both protection and neurological disease. How these cells are organized in humans and what they recognize is largely unknown. Here, we profiled CD8 T cells across anatomically distinct CNS regions, obtained through on-site autopsies and temporal lobe resection surgeries, using single-cell RNA sequencing, paired T cell receptor sequencing, and DNA-barcoded tetramers. Resident memory T cells (TRM) specific for Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 were identified across CNS compartments. Anatomical location was the strongest correlate of TRM cell state, with leptomeningeal cells adopting a cytokine-poised TRM program, whereas brain TRM cells were transcriptionally restrained. Cells of the same clonotype spanned tissues yet adopted local transcriptional states. Viral specificity added another layer of TRM heterogeneity with GZMK/GZMA-expressing EBV-specific populations and interferon-stimulated gene signatures in SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A-specific cells. The human CNS thus harbors regionally distinct CD8+ TRM shaped by common viral exposures.

immunology↗

A regulatory T cell signature provides a shared molecular basis for the therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatic disease

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and osteoarthritis (OA), show distinct phenotypes yet respond to overlapping therapies, implicating shared immune mechanisms. In the Transimmunom cohort, we profiled peripheral blood from 240 individuals (47 healthy, 44 OA, 91 RA, 58 SpA) across deep immunophenotyping, immunoproteomics and Treg-Teff transcriptomics. Single-layer analyses revealed broader Treg than Teff remodeling, along with a shared pattern of reduced activated Tregs and expanded Helios+ Tregs across all diseases, alongside a decrease in functional Treg subpopulations, including CTLA4+ and CD45RA- Tregs. In RA specifically, LAG3+ Tregs were also expanded. Combining omics layers outperformed single-layer approaches for disease classification. Among individual layers, Treg transcriptomes were most discriminative, and integration uncovered disease-specific programs. Unsupervised clustering identified a cross-disease cluster independent of activity, treatment and age, mapping to early disease (<= years) and dominated by a Treg dysfunction-associated program. These results provide a biological rationale for the therapeutic "window of opportunity" concept and duration-stratified Treg-directed trials.

immunology↗

Inhibitory Fc Receptor sets a time limit on macrophage response to IgG

Antibodies engage both activating Fc Receptors and the inhibitory receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB. Why macrophages need a dedicated inhibitory receptor rather than simply tuning activating receptor signaling is unclear. Using DNA-based chimeric receptors and in silico modeling, we independently controlled activating and inhibitory Fc Receptors. We found that Fc{gamma}RIIB imposed a time limit on macrophage phagocytosis and ERK signaling. The time limit is due to activating Fc Receptors converting PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3, which is subsequently converted to PI(3,4)P2 by Fc{gamma}RIIB. This leads to a pulse of active signaling, which is sufficient for phagocytosis of small bacteria-sized targets but not phagocytosis of large targets and TNF secretion. Unlike engaging Fc{gamma}RIIB, reducing activating Fc Receptor signaling decreased initiation of phagocytosis, the speed of PI(3,4,5)P3 generation, and the amplitude of ERK signaling. Our results demonstrate that Fc{gamma}RIIB controls the duration of IgG signaling, while the activating Fc Receptors control sensitivity.

immunology↗