PG-LLM: Benchmarking General-Purpose Language Models for Protein Variant Ranking

Abstract

General-purpose frontier language models are being increasingly utilized for protein-design work, yet their ability to understand and evaluate variant effects remains unclear. Here, we introduce PG-LLM, a benchmark comprising 276 protein-variant prioritization tasks: 217 from ProteinGym and a temporally held-out set of 59 from recently published studies. Each task follows the same format: a language model is asked to rank a list of variant sequences given only the wild-type protein sequence and an assay description with no access to tools, multiple-sequence alignments, or protein structures. We evaluate thirteen language models and 95 published protein predictors on the same variants with the same evaluation metric. Claude Opus 5 (Max) and GPT 5.6 Sol (Max) are the best performing LLMs with Spearman correlations of{rho} = 0.406 and 0.402 respectively. Opus 5 outperforms 49 of 95 published protein predictors, including 41 of 46 sequence-only methods, and approaches ESM2-650M at{rho} = 0.411, but remains below the leading predictor VenusREM at{rho} = 0.523. We observe that variant-ranking performance scales with test-time compute across GPT, Claude, and Gemini models, but gains taper before closing the gap to specialist protein predictors. To address contamination risk, we create a held-out evaluation set with 59 DMS assays from 19 studies whose scores first became public after January 2026. On this set, we observe performance and test time compute scaling trends similar to those on the 217 tasks derived from ProteinGym. PG-LLM shows that tool-free language models capture substantial protein-variant signal, outperforming many sequence-based predictors while remaining below the strongest specialized models.