Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.07.22.736859

Maps of historical forests in France and their temporal continuity since the first half of the 19th century

Abstract

AbstractIntegrating environmental history is essential for understanding present-day ecosystem dynamics and guiding modern conservation strategies, particularly under the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. This data paper presents the nationwide digitisation and vectorisation of the French General Ordnance survey map (1818-1866), capturing the countrys forest cover at its historical minimum (a pivotal moment known as the "forest transition"). The original manuscript sheets surveyed at a 1:40,000 scale (976 sheets) were scanned, georeferenced and vectorised. They offer higher thematic accuracy than the older Cassini map and are far more feasible for nationwide vectorisation than the highly detailed Napoleonic cadastre. The area-weighted mean survey date is 1843, and the dataset covers 99.6% of modern mainland France. To correct for paper deformation, historical surveying errors and coordinate system transformations, a rigorous workflow was established. This shifted from a global 6-parameter affine transformation (root mean square error of 60 m) to a local elastic transformation based on thousands of control points, for 21% of the territory, which reduced the positioning error to 34 m. We assessed data quality by comparing the General Ordnance Survey maps with the Napoleonic cadastre--the standard reference for 19th-century land-use data--across more than 600 municipalities. The correlation between the two sources regarding forest cover percentages was exceptionally high (r>0.9). Because forests formed large, compact blocks of significant strategic interest to military engineers, they were mapped with high precision. Localised inaccuracies were primarily found in remote areas, most notably in the mountains. The resulting historical vector layer was intersected with contemporary forest data (BD Foret(R) v2, 2005-2019). Historical polygons smaller than 0.5 ha were filtered out to comply with modern FAO forest definitions. This spatial overlay generated a new dataset detailing four distinct land-use trajectories: . ancient forests (44.8% of present day forest): land classified as forest in both the 19th century and the present day (indicating maximum temporal continuity). . recent forests (55.2% of present day forest): land that was non-forested in the 19th century but has since undergone reforestation. . deforested areas (18.9% of 19th-century forest): land recorded as forest in the 19th century but subsequently converted to other land uses. . stable non-forest areas: land that has remained unforested across both periods. Our results suggest that the forest area of mainland France at its historical minimum should be revised upward to 9.9 million ha. A preliminary analysis further indicates that current spatial variation in forest cover is explained more by land-use dynamics occurring since the forest transition than by the initial extent of forest cover. These two open-access national datasets (the 19th-century forest layer and the land-use transition map) open the door to a better understanding of present-day forests : e.g. their biodiversity, soil quality, tree growth and belowground water quality. Furthermore, they provide decision-support tools for conservation planning. Key messageIn this data paper, we provide a map of 19th-century forests in France based on the digitisation of the military topographic map (1818-1866). By overlaying this historical source with the present-day forest map, we built a second map which allows the identification of ancient forests, recent forests, and deforestation. These maps offer avenues for historical ecology and the design of conservation strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dupouey, J.-L., Berges, L., Leroy, N., Lafite, R., Archaux, F., Auge, V., Bec, R., Bellifa, M., Bourguignon, J., Buridant, J., Burlin, B., Caubet, S., Chaleat, A., Chauchard, S., Cordonnier, T., Decocq, G., Delcamp, M., Fleury, J., Gaudin, S., Gervaise, A., Gautier, G., Guilloux, J., Hamel, A., Heintz, W., Janssen, P., Labonne, S., Lair, P., Lallemant, T., Landmann, G., Larrieu, L., Martin, H., Michel, C., Mollier, S., Panaïotis, C., Renaux, B., Rochel, X., Salvaudon, A., Thomas, M., Touzet, T., Vallauri, D.. 2026-07-23. Maps of historical forests in France and their temporal continuity since the first half of the 19th century. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.22.736859

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Rapid estimation of insect biodiversity using AI assisted image analysis:a cost-effective tool for monitoring and ecological assessmen

Protection of natural areas and environmentally friendly management of anthropogenic landscapes require reliable tools for monitoring and comparing biodiversity. Bioindicator-based approaches can support large-scale ecological assessment, but insect monitoring remains constrained by the taxonomic expertise required for species identification. Here, we propose an AI-supported index for estimating the biodiversity of flying insects, based on the diversity of visual features of insect bodies. Flying insects were captured using yellow sticky traps across agricultural and natural habitats, seasons, crops, and sites in Israel's Mediterranean region. Traps were scanned at high resolution and uploaded to a dedicated image database. A machine learning model was used to detect and delineate insects, after which engineered visual features representing body size, color, and shape were extracted. Biodiversity was estimated from distances among feature vectors and compared with taxonomic diversity derived from expert identification of a representative validation set. The AI-derived diversity index correlated strongly with expert-based taxonomic diversity, supporting the hypothesis that morphological variation in insect images can provide a proxy for taxonomic diversity. Applying the index to the full dataset revealed a negative relationship between insect abundance and diversity, while diversity also varied across habitats and sampling seasons. Our results demonstrate the potential of AI-based image analysis to provide rapid and cost-effective assessments of insect biodiversity without requiring complete taxonomic identification. This approach may facilitate biodiversity monitoring and support timely ecological assessment and decision-making in sustainable agricultural and landscape management.

ecology↗

Pervasive ethanol in the fruits and floral nectars consumed by tropical frugivores

Dietary ethanol has long been proposed as a selective force shaping the diets and physiology of tropical frugivores and nectarivores, yet this idea has rested on measurements from only a few species and sites. Here, we present the first global survey of ethanol in wild fruits and flowers (591 and 37 species, respectively, across 18 countries) and test ecological and phylogenetic predictors of its variation. We detected ethanol in the ripened fruits of 72% of angiosperm species (211 species, N [≥] 3 per species; 0.021% - 3.9% alcohol by volume (ABV)). Ethanol was also detected in the flowers of 12 species (0.037% - 0.73% ABV). Maximum fruit ethanol varied with temperature, humidity, and phylogenetic relatedness, and it was higher in ripe fruits collected from the forest floor relative to their canopy counterparts. We then extrapolated potential daily ethanol consumption for 10 primate species. Estimated maximum daily ethanol ingestion for primates ranged from negligible to 0.72 g/kg/day on average (equivalent to 5.1 international standard drinks, 10 g ethanol each, for a 70 kg human). Our findings show that ethanol is widespread in plant reproductive tissues and shaped by both phylogeny and environment, supporting the hypothesis that dietary ethanol has been a pervasive selective pressure on fruit- and nectar-feeding animals.

ecology↗

Thermal Similarity Attenuates the Strength of Bergmanns Rule in Birds

Geographic body size variation, classically framed as Bergmann's rule, is a fundamental indicator of temperature-mediated morphological adaptation. However, empirical support for Bergmann's rule in birds remains highly unpredictable across lineages. We hypothesized that this variation is caused by differences in thermal similarity among species within the same genus, which may limit temperature driven changes in body size and be influenced by ecological factors. Using a global dataset comprising 5,715 bird species across 513 genera, we observed that thermal similarity was the strongest predictor of variation in the strength of Bergmann's rule among competing hypotheses. Among genera exhibiting significantly negative body mass temperature relationships, higher thermal similarity was consistently associated with less negative slopes, indicating weaker Bergmannian clines. Subgroup analyses indicated that the positive thermal similarity slope association was supported in dense and semi open habitats and among nonmigratory birds, but was not clearly supported in open habitats or among migratory birds. Our findings provide a novel explanation for variation in the strength of Bergmannian clines among avian lineages, showing that stronger morphological differentiation along thermal gradients is associated with greater thermal contrast. Consequently, our findings provide a basis for testing whether incorporating thermal similarity and ecological context can improve forecasts of avian morphological responses to ongoing climate change.

ecology↗