Endogenous attention is invariant to sequential effects in performance around the visual field

Abstract

Covert spatial attention selects and prioritizes relevant sensory information. Endogenous attention is voluntary, goal-driven, and flexible. However, it cannot alleviate visual polar-angle asymmetries, specifically, the horizontal-vertical anisotropy and the vertical meridian asymmetry. Visual perception is affected by both current sensory inputs and contextual information over time and space, such as the perception of preceding trials. Previous studies reported sequential effects whereby attention interacts with response repetitions. But it is unknown whether and how endogenous attention modulation on performance varies as a function of target location and trial history. Here, we reanalyzed data from three published studies of endogenous attention in orientation discrimination tasks, to (1) assess the typical sequential effects on response, in which response to the current trial is biased toward the previous one, and (2) examine if sequential effects would modulate the performance across locations, across four dimensions: (1) location, (2) feature, (3) attention repetition condition, and (4) the correctness of the preceding (n -1) trial. First, we demonstrated typical sequential effects of response repetition to the repeated location and feature aspects of the target. Second, we found a robust effect of attention on performance, but the results did not reveal evidence of sequential attention effects as a function of the four dimensions in any of the three studies. Moreover, there were no interactions between attention and location when considering trial history. Together, these findings provide compelling evidence that visual polar-angle asymmetries are resistant to endogenous attention, and that even top- down factors-sequential effects-do not alleviate these asymmetries in performance.