Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.07.15.738836

An automated platform for spatial functional modeling and fingerprint analysis of tissue molecular landscapes

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables high-resolution molecular profiling while preserving tissue architecture, creating new opportunities to investigate how disease-associated pathways are organized within tissues. However, existing analytical approaches largely focus on individual pathways or cell types and do not provide a unified framework for modeling spatially varying pathway interactions across tissue sections and anatomical planes. We present an integrative framework, Spatial Fingerprints Analytics (SFinx), that introduces the concept of a spatial fingerprint for representing patterns of molecular signatures, and Spatial Functional Data Analysis for spatial regression and mapping of localized pathway activity and pathway-phenotype interactions in complex tissues. Applying SFinx to ST datasets on murine lupus nephritis, we reconstructed continuous spatial landscapes of pathway activity and disease-associated phenotypes across kidney sections. This approach identified anatomically restricted inflammatory domains characterized by coordinated activation of immune pathways and revealed substantial spatial heterogeneity in pathway crosstalk across renal compartments. Using generalized additive models with tensor-product splines, we quantified spatially varying associations between lupus nephritis and neutrophil activation pathways across tissue sections, uncovering regions with both positive and negative relationships that would be obscured by conventional bulk analyses. Multi-slice integration further demonstrated reproducible spatial interaction patterns while accounting for section-specific variability. Together, SFinx transforms mixed-spot transcriptomic measurements into interpretable spatial pathway landscapes and interaction maps, providing a general framework for identifying localized disease mechanisms. SFinx revealed previously unrecognized spatial organization of inflammatory signaling in lupus nephritis and presents a broadly applicable strategy for studying spatially coordinated biological processes in cancers, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hajihosseini, M., Patino-Martinez, E., Ghosal, R., Kaplan, M. J., Pyne, S.. 2026-07-21. An automated platform for spatial functional modeling and fingerprint analysis of tissue molecular landscapes. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.15.738836

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗