Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.07.15.738747

Epidermal and ECM Damage Following Pinch Injury Restricts Dendrite Regeneration in Drosophila

Abstract

Neuronal dendrites can be injured by a number of insults, but the cellular mechanism by which dendrites respond to tissue injury and undergo repair is poorly understood. Much of the fields progress has evaluated dendrite regeneration following laser injury. While precise, laser injury does not accurately model the real-world damage to surrounding tissue that would accompany neuronal injury. Here, we modify a pinch injury technique to injure both the dendrites and their surrounding tissues in Drosophila melanogaster larvae, more similar to what is observed in real-world injury. We refined this technique such that only half of a sensory neurons dendrites are injured, leaving the other half uninjured. Our data indicate that both dynamic and stable dendritic arbors regrow dendrites following pinch injury. Neurons primarily engage in compensatory regeneration whereby new branches are added on the uninjured half of the arbor. Comparing the regenerative response following pinch versus laser injury revealed that dendrites preferentially regrew into areas where the surrounding tissue was left intact, and not into areas where the surrounding tissue was damaged by pinch. These results prompted us to evaluate the damage sustained to surrounding tissue. In examining non-neuronal tissues after pinch injury, we found damage to epidermal cells and the ECM, but not glia. We also observed a robust immune response on the pinched half of the arbor. We conclude that the sustained damage to surrounding tissue and the initiation of an immune response create a non-permissive environment for dendrite regeneration following pinch injury. Significance StatementNeuronal dendrites are injured in clinical conditions, such as stroke, traumatic brain injury, and neonatal hypoxia. Dendrites also degenerate in the early stages of a number of neurodegenerative diseases. The role of surrounding tissues in dendrite regeneration is poorly characterized, especially considering that neuronal injury is typically accompanied by broad tissue damage. Our data evaluates dendrite regeneration following an injury that better mirrors real-world conditions and demonstrates that broad tissue damage diminishes a neurons capacity to regenerate its dendrites. Our findings show that neurons preferentially regrow into intact, undamaged tissue environments, addressing a large gap in the fields knowledge: how damage to the surrounding tissue limits neuron regeneration after injury. Visual Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=160 SRC="FIGDIR/small/738747v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (44K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b3f41forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@160284dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f5f6b5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@118208d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brantley, M. A., Pandiyan, A., Danh, A. C., Prange, S. E., Rimicci, D. S., Thompson-Peer, K. L.. 2026-07-21. Epidermal and ECM Damage Following Pinch Injury Restricts Dendrite Regeneration in Drosophila. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.15.738747

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗