Recommendations for the ethical and accurate use of population descriptors: a trainee-led survey of early-career researchers

Abstract

Despite the importance of population descriptors in human genomics research, many scientists struggle to translate evolving ethical guidelines into their computational workflows. To characterize this gap between recommendations and implementation, we conducted a mixed-methods survey of early-career researchers to assess how they understand and implement the landmark 2023 NASEM report on the use of population descriptors in human genetics research. We show that while exposure to the report fosters ethical awareness, fundamental misconceptions about race and ancestry persist across academic disciplines, and trainees face structural bottlenecks, including legacy data constraints and a lack of technical confidence. To address this gap, we offer actionable, stakeholder-specific recommendations across the research lifecycle ranging from decision-support tools to "bring-your-own-data" workshops to leadership from academic journals, scientific societies, and trainee mentors. Ultimately, we argue that to promote scientific rigor and reduce bias in genetic discoveries, the scientific ecosystem must invest in the infrastructure necessary to empower the next generation of researchers.