Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.06.21.733646

CNSigs: An R Package for the Identification of Copy Number Mutational Signatures

Abstract

Copy number aberrations (CNAs) are gains and losses of large genomic segments present across most cancer types and are a hallmark of cancer genomic alterations. However, the processes underlying CNAs and characteristic patterns of CNAs are poorly understood. Bioinformatic advances have identified underlying single nucleotide variant mutational signatures resulting from distinct mutational processes, yet development of algorithms able to uncover similar signatures for CNAs remains less advanced. Using segmented data files from DNA sequencing, six copy number features are extracted for signature determination: segment size, breakpoints, copy number oscillation, changepoint size, copy number, and breakpoints per chromosome arm, along with ploidy. Mixed model approaches and non-negative matrix factorization are utilized to derive CNA signatures across cancer types. The full methodology was packaged in a publicly available, robust R package, CNSigs. To verify reproducibility, we derived five signatures from two independent breast cancer datasets (total n>3000), demonstrating high accuracy (average cosine similarity = 0.89). Pan-cancer application of CNSigs in TCGA resulted in derivation of 13 pan-cancer signatures which were significantly associated with disease-specific survival. Benchmarking CNSigs to two other CNA signature approaches within TCGA demonstrated non-overlapping signatures and favorable compute speed for CNSigs. We evaluated n=24 pairs of tumor and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) that demonstrated that CNSigs are detectable and reproducible via ctDNA, with significant association of CNSig11 with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer progression-free survival specifically for taxane chemotherapy. CNSigs association with immunophenotype was evaluated in low-grade glioma and CNSig3 was found to be highly prognostic yet complementary to immune features. The CNSigs allows researchers to easily analyze their own samples to derive copy number signatures and evaluate clinical associations. We demonstrate its potential application in ctDNA and association with treatment response. The development of this package allows further investigation of underlying processes that may be responsible for CNA fingerprints.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tallman, D., Striker, S., Byappanahalli, A. M., Stockard, S., Jenison, J., Collier, K. A., Blige, E., Vater, M., Stover, D. G.. 2026-06-25. CNSigs: An R Package for the Identification of Copy Number Mutational Signatures. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.21.733646

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗