Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.06.19.733320

Patterns of molecular conservation along tooth development are only partly shaped by evolutionary pressures on tooth

Ganofsky, J.·Estevez-Villar, M.·Mouginot, M.·Moretti, S.·Nyamari, M.·Robinson-Rechavi, M.·Pantalacci, S.·Semon, M.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Although it is well established that certain stages of development are molecularly more conserved than others, the reasons for this phenomenon remain largely unknown. We study molecular conservation in the development of an organ, the molar, by comparing the temporal profiles of expression in mice and hamsters. We find that the cause of conservation of expression and of coding sequences changes over molar development. Gene expression levels display a classical increase of divergence as development progresses. In terms of genes expressed, the composition of early and late stages is better conserved and enriched in pleiotropic genes, yet each stage mobilizes different sets of pleiotropic genes, cell division for bud growth and secretion for tooth mineralization. Moreover similar patterns of higher divergence of gene sets and of coding sequences at mid development, are caused by different biological phenomena, in that case heterochronies and blood colonisation respectively. In conclusion, the patterns of molecular conservation in developing molars are shaped by a combination of processes intrinsic to the teeth, and by negative and positive selection on functions which are mostly extrinsic to the teeth. This is likely translatable to explain molecular conservation patterns in many other biological systems. AUTHOR SUMMARYFor species to evolve different adaptations to different life styles, their anatomy has to evolve correspondingly. This in turn implies evolution of the embryonic development of anatomical structures. Notably, tooth shape can evolve rapidly as an adaptation to different diets. Mice and hamsters are closely related rodents who yet differ in the shape of their molars, and thus in their development. In this study, we investigated why the genes active in molar development are more or less similar between the two species from early tooth bud to fully formed embryo molar. We found that early and late molar development were slow evolving, while mid-development was evolving faster. But surprisingly, this was in part due not to tooth evolution, but to the involvement of genes which are active in other processes in the body. For example an influx of immune cells also brings fast evolving immune genes. This helps us understand better the complexity of causes of apparently simple evolutionary patterns.

Explore related subjects

evolutionary biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ganofsky, J., Estevez-Villar, M., Mouginot, M., Moretti, S., Nyamari, M., Robinson-Rechavi, M., Pantalacci, S., Semon, M.. 2026-06-19. Patterns of molecular conservation along tooth development are only partly shaped by evolutionary pressures on tooth. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.19.733320

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗
bioRxiv2026

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗