Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.06.01.728948

Prostaglandins regulate the nucleoskeleton during Drosophila border cell migration

Goll, A. C.·Li, N.·Nacino, E. A.·Bex, K. H.·Strand, S. C.·Giedt, M. S.·Tootle, T. L.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The nucleoskeleton, which is comprised of Lamin A (stiffer), Lamin B, and Lamin interacting proteins, including Emerin, controls nuclear stiffness. Nuclear stiffness regulates 3D single cell migration, but its roles in collective cell migration remain unclear. To define the roles of the nucleoskeleton during collective migration we use Drosophila border cell migration. During migration the nucleoskeleton remodels. Throughout migration, Lamin A is predominantly in the nucleoskeleton of the polar cells, whereas Emerin is progressively reduced in the nucleoskeletons of both the border and polar cells, and Lamin B increases in the border cell nucleoskeleton. Further, the border cell nucleoskeleton is polarized; Lamin B is enriched in the front of the cluster while Emerin is enriched in the back. These nucleoskeletal changes require prostaglandin (PG) signaling. When PG signaling is lost, border cell migration is delayed, Lamin A and Emerin are prevalent within the border cell nucleoskeletons throughout migration and nucleoskeletal polarity is lost. Further, overexpression of Lamin A R237P in the border cells delays migration. These data reveal that border cell cluster nucleoskeletal remodeling requires PG signaling and support that this remodeling facilitates invasive, collective migration. Similar PG regulation of the nucleoskeleton likely promotes collective migration across organisms and contexts. Significance StatementO_LINucleoskeletal remodeling is critical for 3D single cell migration, but its roles in collective migration are poorly understood. C_LIO_LIDuring Drosophila border cell migration, the nucleoskeleton remodels and exhibits polarity that suggests the nuclei are softer in the front and stiffer in the back of the cluster. PG signaling is required for these nucleoskeletal changes and on-time border cell migration. Overexpression of Lamin A R237P in the border cells impairs migration. C_LIO_LIThese results demonstrate for the first time that nucleoskeletal remodeling occurs during an in vivo, collective cell migration and identify PG signaling as a novel regulator of the nucleoskeleton. C_LI

Explore related subjects

cell biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Goll, A. C., Li, N., Nacino, E. A., Bex, K. H., Strand, S. C., Giedt, M. S., Tootle, T. L.. 2026-06-02. Prostaglandins regulate the nucleoskeleton during Drosophila border cell migration. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.01.728948

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

A dynamic phosphoproteome reveals stage-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Leishmania

Leishmania parasites undergo extensive morphological and metabolic remodelling during their transition from motile insect promastigotes to non-motile intracellular amastigotes, yet how dynamic protein kinase signalling drives this process remains poorly understood. Here, we present a high-resolution temporal phosphoproteome of L. mexicana promastigote to axenic amastigote differentiation, profiling 16,495 phosphosites on 3,101 proteins across seven developmental time points and identifying 5,795 dynamically regulated sites. This temporal map reveals stage-specific signalling programs, including regulated sites in MPK2 and non-regulated sites in MRK1, protein kinases known to be essential for amastigote differentiation. Using analogue-sensitive (AS) chemical genetics, we show that acute inhibition of either kinase in axenic amastigotes disrupts the spatial coordination of cleavage furrow ingression with nuclear and kinetoplast segregation, revealing essential cytokinesis roles obscured in constitutive gene deletions. Despite generating similar cytokinesis phenotypes, genetic over-expression and cellular localisation analyses demonstrate that MPK2 and MRK1 act through spatially segregated signalling pathways. Time-resolved phosphoproteomics upon MPK2 inhibition places its activity upstream of cytoskeletal remodelling networks. Importantly, we show that the stage-specific requirement for MPK2 is defined by the parasite's morphology: while motile promastigotes tolerate MPK2 inhibition, genetic ablation of flagellar motility sensitises them to loss of MPK2 activity. Thus, flagellar motility acts as a mechanical buffer during promastigote division, explaining why non-motile amastigotes are vulnerable to MPK2 inhibition. Together, our findings provide a systems level framework for Leishmania signalling and demonstrate that cellular architecture and biomechanics dictate protein kinase dependency across developmental stages of the parasite.

cell biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Single-cell Transcriptome-Proteome-PTMome(x8)-Metabolome (scTPPM) co-profiling decodes multimodal regulation during mouse oocyte meiosis

Single-cell multi-omics technology is crucial for comprehensive characterization of cellular molecular features. Despite recent advances in single-cell multi-omics approaches, co-profiling of nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) within the same cell individuals remains major challenges. Here, we developed a single-cell transcriptome, proteome, PTMome, and metabolome (scTPPM) profiling approach, enabling simultaneous analysis of transcriptomes, proteomes, eight types of PTMs (e.g., phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, O_GlcNAc, acetylation, crotonylation, lactylation, and succinylation), and metabolomes in individual cells. We demonstrated the scTPPM's performance in tumor cell lines and oocyte samples, reaching total identification and quantification of 27,668 genes, 4,847 proteins, 1,508 PTM sites, and 680 metabolites in single mouse oocytes. We profiled previously-uncharacterized dynamic crosstalk among the entire metabolic pathways from metabolic enzyme expression and regulation to metabolite-mediated post-translational modifications during oocyte maturation. In summary, scTPPM provided an effective workflow for multi-omics co-profiling in single cells, enabling multi-layered insights into complex regulatory network.

cell biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Sequence context and partner availability specify divergent cell fates from a single transcription factor

Transcription factors drive the gene regulatory networks that control developmental transitions, yet which of their many targets a cell uses remains unresolved. Expressing Cebp, Cebp{beta} or Cebp{delta} identically, alone or with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc, gave four outcomes: adipocyte from fibroblasts and neural stem cells, trophectoderm from embryonic stem cells, and myeloid from B cells. Raising Cebp levels changed how many sites it reached, not which sequence it read: clustered motifs maintained somatic enhancers, while spillover onto low-copy sites created de novo enhancers carrying composites of Cebp and cell-type-restricted partners. In fibroblasts, Cebp also redistributed Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 from early targets, blocking iPSC formation. Supplying the predicted partners rewrote the output: Spi1 redirected Cebp into parallel adipogenic and myeloid programs, via a transient PpargCD45 state using separate enhancers for each; TFAP2C abolished adipogenic conversion. Motif density and partner composites therefore assemble a factor's instructive output in the receiving cell.

cell biology↗