Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.05.31.729042

Shape, Shrink, Spheroid: A DIY High-throughput Spheroid Generation Device

Abstract

3D spheroids, which closely replicate three-dimensional cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions, offer superior predictive capabilities compared to conventional 2D monolayer cultures, positioning them as forward-looking platforms in drug testing, cancer biology, and regenerative medicine. However, high-throughput generation of uniform sized spheroids is still a technological challenge. In one hand, the use of conventional ultra-low attachment (ULA) multiwell plates for this purpose is labour intensive and complex. On the other hand, the use of microfabricated facilities demands cutting-edge infrastructure such as clean room, photolithography, and microfluidic setup which are often unavailable for the resource constrained laboratories. In this study, we addressed these problems by developing a low-cost Do-It-Yourself (DIY), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and agarose-based spheroid generation device, capable of producing and maintaining hundreds of spheroids with minimal user intervention. We have demonstrated two variants based on their size, termed here as S1 and S2 devices which fit into 6-well and 12-well plates, and can generate 600 and 1200 uniform-sized spheroids respectively. We validated our device with various cell lines including primary and cancerous cell lines. We further demonstrated the drug testing capabilities of the device by estimating the IC50 value of the anticancer drug Temozolomide on U87-MG. The value was comparable with the same obtained from the spheroids generated using conventional ULA plates. Additional attachment of a perfusion system made the device suitable for long-term spheroid culture without much user intervention. Furthermore, the devices can also be used for the production of spheroids with gradually changing diameters in a controlled manner, resembling a size gradient. This feature is useful for checking the effect of drugs on different-sized spheroids and for co-culturing spheroids with varying cell densities, mimicking the disease architecture. We have co-cultured two types of the placental trophoblast cells, i.e., extravillous trophoblast (HTR-8) and syncytiotrophoblast (BeWo) with varying densities. In summary, this paper demonstrates a unique DIY method for a high-throughput uniform-sized spheroid generation at a fraction of cost which can be deployed to resource-constrained labs.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mogha, P., Mukherjee, S., Gangwar, T., Roy, D., Vichare, A., Kulkarni, S., Sharma, V., Majumder, A.. 2026-06-03. Shape, Shrink, Spheroid: A DIY High-throughput Spheroid Generation Device. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.31.729042

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Dynamic Compression Platform for Live Imaging of Scaffold-Transmitted Cellular Mechanoresponses

Mechanical characterization of biomaterial scaffolds is essential to evaluate their capacity to meet the functional demands of target tissues in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Scaffolds designed to interface with living tissues must support the transmission of mechanical cues to resident cells and stimulate mechanosignaling pathways that are essential to their function. In joints, bone and cartilage cells act as primary mechanosensors, converting mechanical stimuli into biochemical signals that regulate tissue homeostasis and remodelling. Therefore, evaluating cellular mechanoresponses to scaffold-transmitted compression in vitro can inform the development of functional tissue-engineered constructs. For example, poly({epsilon}-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds are highly relevant for bone and cartilage tissue engineering due to their biocompatibility, stable mechanical properties and slow degradation. Here, we applied a custom-built device to study compression-induced mechanosignaling in MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells. The device is composed of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) pillar, a force-sensing load cell, and a piezoelectric linear track. A protocol is described in which MC3T3-E1 cells are repeatedly compressed, while in parallel live tracking of force measurements and live imaging of intracellular calcium dynamics in MC3T3-E1 cells are recorded. PCL scaffolds fabricated by melt electrowriting (MEW) were subsequently integrated into the platform. Scaffold-transmitted compression triggered dynamic increases in cytosolic calcium; in MC3T3-E1 cells located directly under the PCL microfibers, but also in cells located in the interfiber spaces. This device and workflow facilitate in vitro investigations of real-time cellular mechanoresponses to dynamic compression applied with biomaterial scaffolds, and provides a testing platform for evaluating the mechanotransductive properties of scaffolds intended for tissue engineering applications.

bioengineering↗

Ultrasound Tracking Reveals Progressive Regional Strain Differences in Human Achilles Tendons During Fatigue Loading

Ultrasound is commonly used to assess structural changes in symptomatic Achilles tendons, but quantitative biomechanical metrics for progressive tendon deterioration remain limited. The goal of this study was to develop and validate an automated ultrasound tracking algorithm for regional tendon deformation and evaluate strain progression in survived and ruptured tendons during fatigue loading. We hypothesized that maximum strain, average strain, and strain heterogeneity would exhibit different trajectories between groups. Ten cadaveric Achilles tendons underwent cyclic loading with stress tests every 500 cycles until rupture or 150,000 cycles. Ultrasound images acquired during stress tests were analyzed using an automated tracking algorithm to generate spatially resolved regional strain fields. Ultrasound-derived bulk strain was highly correlated with actuator-derived strain in survived (R^2 = 0.968 +/- 0.017) and ruptured tendons (R^2 = 0.972 +/- 0.014). Maximum and average longitudinal strains progressively diverged between groups across fatigue life (Group x FatigueLife: p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). During the first 10,000 cycles, average strain decreased in survived tendons ({beta} = -0.0268%, p = 0.0215) but not ruptured tendons ({beta} = 0.0147%, p = 0.1197), with a significant Group x Cycle interaction (p = 0.0061). This study demonstrates that the algorithm quantified Achilles tendon deformation with high fidelity and enabled spatially resolved strain assessment throughout fatigue loading. Maximum and average strain followed different trajectories between groups, whereas strain heterogeneity did not. Early differences in tendon biomechanics suggest that regional strain behavior may change before pronounced differences in absolute magnitude develop.

bioengineering↗

Brain organoid computing for robotic decision-making

Biomimicry has inspired the evolution of robotics toward greater autonomy, adaptability, and symbiosis with humans and dynamic environments. However, current robotic systems still face major challenges in recapitulating the high-efficiency decision-making capabilities of the human brain under complex and dynamic conditions. Here, we present Brainobot, a biohybrid robotic system that establishes a brain organoid controller as a high-level robotic decision-making layer for closed-loop embodiment. By leveraging brain organoid reservoir computing, Brainobot interacts with dynamic environments by receiving and processing sensory inputs and generating motor actions. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, Brainobot is implemented in a humanoid robotic system to perform real-world tasks, including object grasping and laser chasing. Interestingly, Brainobot exhibits unique features, including cross-task adaptivity, high computing efficiency, and low energy consumption. Thus, our approach may provide insights for advancing robotic embodiment and understanding biological decision-making.

bioengineering↗