Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.05.29.728632

Modeling of Glucosinolate Biosynthesis During Biotic Stress as a Function of mRNA

Abstract

Glucosinolates are an important group of specialized metabolites in the Brassicaceae family, playing a role as defensive compounds against biotic attackers. In response to biotic stress, plants upregulate glucosinolate biosynthesis in part by increasing the abundance of enzymes in the glucosinolate biosynthetic pathway. As an increase in enzyme abundance is often preceded by an increase in the corresponding mRNA levels, the dynamic changes in mRNA levels should capture the information required to infer how metabolite levels change over time. In order to test this hypothesis, a time series of experimental glucosinolate content data collected from Arabidopsis thaliana, exposed to either a mock or methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment, as a proxy for biotic stress, was combined with existing mRNA abundance data over time at the same developmental stage and treatment. We propose the GEEM model, a multilevel mechanistic ordinary differential equation (ODE) model, which goes from Gene expression to an enzyme level model, followed by a Michaelis Menten kinetics metabolite model, to simulate the dynamics of a segment of the indolic glucosinolate pathway. In order to constrain the GEEM model, three models were fit to experimental de novo specialized metabolite data, using different degrees of freedom by utilizing both a Gradient Boosted Tree model with a tested architecture to predict the kinetic constants, and augmenting these predictions with a literature review of the known Michaelis Menten kinetic constants from the glucosinolate pathway. Using Sequential Monte Carlo - Approximate Bayesian Computing to fit the GEEM model to the experimental data, we showed that given the mRNA levels and initial concentrations of metabolites, the changes in specialized metabolites over time and treatment can be modeled. Author SummaryWe study how plants adjust their natural chemical defenses over time when they are under attack from living organisms. In the mustard family, including the subject of our experiment Arabidopsis, one important group of defense chemicals is called glucosinolates. When Arabidopsis is under attack, certain gene pathways can be activated or deactivated, allowing the plant to modulate the amount of enzymes they produce, which in turn modulates the levels of these defensive chemicals. In this work, we combine measurements of gene activity and glucosinolate levels from Arabidopsis treated with a compound used in stress signal that mimics insect or pathogen attack. We then constructed a mathematical model that goes from gene activity, to amount of enzyme present, and ends with the amounts of specific glucosinolates over time. By fitting this model to experimental data, we show that it is possible to predict how glucosinolate levels change over time from the gene activity and initial glucosinolate levels. Our approach offers a way to connect gene expression datasets to real changes in plant defense chemistry, with potential applications in plant breeding and insight into how these pathways change due to stress.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Earle, J., Neefjes, A. C. M., Ploeger, X. S. D., van Laar, M., Van Wees, S. C. M., Schuurink, R. C., van Dijk, A. D. J., Bleeker, P., Hoefsloot, H.. 2026-05-30. Modeling of Glucosinolate Biosynthesis During Biotic Stress as a Function of mRNA. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.29.728632

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Parsimonious Creatures: Building Gene Regulatory Networks Robust to Somatic Evolution

For early multicellular life to have formed and maintained cellular organization, preventing loss of controlled cell replication due to somatic evolution was of critical importance, and remains important to this day for control of cancer. We study how gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be designed to slow the divergence of somatic clonal lineages in the context of early multicellular life. We model the mutation of GRNs within simplified 12-celled organisms we term "parsimonious creatures", who must replicate from a single cell to 12 cells and then prevent replication past 12 cells to maximize fitness. We found two minimal motifs can achieve these goals, but both are prone to breakdown through somatic evolution: The feedforward motif, which is loosely regulating but relatively robust, and the simple step motif, which uses strong interactions and feedback to form memoryless ultrasensitivity, but is fragile. These simple motifs may be duplicated to form redundant networks via one of two structures: averaging redundancy, which averages multiple sources of information, and min redundancy, which adopts the most conservative source. Averaging redundancy uniformly slows somatic evolution, while min redundancy stalls somatic evolution until neutral mutations accumulate. Either may be superior dependent on life history. However, averaging redundancy slowly increases fitness as the network becomes larger, but large min redundancy networks eventually become "paralyzed", increasing the probability of senescence and reducing fitness. These GRN designs are idealized, yet provide imperfect solutions with fundamental tradeoffs, offering insight as to why somatic evolution remains an incompletely solved problem for multicellular life.

systems biology↗

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗