Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.05.22.727106

No need for fat: Nutritional preferences affect pollen foraging networks in alpine pollinator communities

Abstract

Most flowering plant species rely on insect pollinators for successful cross-pollination. While floral color, scent, and morphology help attract visitors, the primary motivation for visiting a flower is the nutritional reward - nectar and, especially, pollen. Pollen provides a complete set of macro- and micronutrients essential for adult and larval provisioning in many insect flower visitors. However, pollen nutrient composition (i.e., quality) varies widely among plant species, and different visitors may have distinct nutritional requirements. Whether these differences are linked to the selection of plants visited remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated whether the nutrient composition of pollen is linked to the visitation patterns of two main alpine pollinator groups: bumblebees and hoverflies. We observed flower visits in the field and identified the origin of pollen collected by bumblebees and hoverflies via metabarcoding. In addition, we analyzed the nutrient profiles of alpine flowering plants from the same habitat, including amino acids, fatty acids, and sterols. We hypothesized that both bumblebees and hoverflies (i) differ in the plant spectrum they were observed on/collected from and visited for pollen collection, (ii) and that preferred nutrient profiles differ between the two pollinator groups. We additionally expected (iii) that, in the studied alpine plant communities, the nutrient composition of pollen of plant species collected by flower visitors is more strongly associated with pollinator identity than with plant phylogeny due to competition for pollinators. Our results revealed that alpine bumblebees and hoverflies were more similar in their pollen hosts and nutritional preferences than expected, but, for both groups, the network based on observed flower visits differed significantly from that based on pollen collection. Pollen fatty acids and amino acids content was positively correlated, and both bumblebees and hoverflies preferred pollen with low fatty and amino acid content. Pollen sterols did not differ between plants collected by pollinators and non-collected plants. Neither fatty acid, amino acid, nor sterol composition was linked to plant phylogeny. Our findings suggest that not only amino acid content, but also fatty acid content, plays a key role in shaping pollen-collection patterns of flower visitors in alpine ecosystems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Schleifer, M. C., Neumayer, J., Ruedenauer, F. A., Castiglioni, L., Keller, A., Spaethe, J., Leonhardt, S. D.. 2026-05-26. No need for fat: Nutritional preferences affect pollen foraging networks in alpine pollinator communities. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.22.727106

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Deconstructing Boldness: Latent behavioural structure across novelty, predation, and exploration in an endangered species translocation program

Risk-related behaviours including neophobia, exploration, and predator avoidance are often assumed to covary along a general boldness axis. Although some translocation studies have linked one or more of these behaviours with fitness, it is possible that the underlying behavioural structure varies under different selective environments. Conservation breeding programs provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the structure of behavioural correlations in a non-domestic species under artificial conditions. We tested whether risk-related behaviours represent a unified boldness syndrome in a captive population of the endangered Attwaters prairie chicken (APC; Tympanuchus cupido attwateri). We quantified the repeatable behaviours of 257 juveniles and compared 11 models of behavioural covariation structure using multivariate mixed models and confirmatory factor analysis. There was no support for a single risk-taking axis; instead, we found three dimensions representing responses to novelty and environmental stimuli (Engagement), predator avoidance (Threat Response), and maze exploration (Maze Progression). Our results indicate that these risk-related behaviours are not organized along a single axis in captive APCs, challenging assumptions that risk-taking represents a universal behavioural syndrome. To anticipate post-release success accurately, conservation managers should understand the exact behavioural architecture of the captive population rather than assume that the classical bold-shy structure occurs in all contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Social costs of group life: Larger groups have less affiliative behavior and more social conflict

The costs and benefits of sociality depend in part upon the size of groups. Therefore, individual behavior should vary across groups of different sizes, reflecting group size-dependent costs and benefits. Here, we test this prediction using a long-term dataset on wild female baboons (Papio cynocephalus x P. anubis). We find that individuals who live in larger groups suffer social costs: compared to animals in smaller groups, they experience more agonistic interactions, fewer grooming interactions, and sparser social networks. These social costs arise, in part, from a pattern in which relationships within dyads become more agonistic as group size increases (i.e., a given dyad exhibits fewer grooming interactions relative to agonistic interactions when it is living in a larger group). While individuals in large groups generally maintain the same number of strong bonds as individuals in small groups, they tend to develop weak bonds with a greater number of social partners that results in, on average, weaker bonds overall. Our results demonstrate that, despite potential benefits to large groups in terms of predation risk and intergroup competition, the social lives of individuals in larger groups involve less affiliation and more conflict in this wild primate population.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Shared brain transcriptome signatures of social evolution and plasticity in shell-dwelling cichlid fishes

Inter-individual variability in phenotypic traits is widespread in nature both across and within species, with similar patterns of variation often occurring between and within species. Given that these two types of variation are generated by evolutionary and plasticity processes respectively, it raises the question to what extent the causal mechanisms underlying such variability at these two different levels are shared or not. To address this question, we studied the variation in brain transcriptomes in Tanganyikan cichlids that exhibit both intra- and interspecific variation in social behavior. We compared two facultatively social cichlid species, each containing naturally occurring solitary and social-living individuals, with a closely related obligatory solitary resembling the ancestral state. Differential gene expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed in the telencephalon and diencephalon transcriptomes to investigate the molecular basis of both behavioral plasticity and the evolution of sociality. Behavioral plasticity involved few differentially expressed genes but extensive changes in biological pathways, supporting a highly polygenic architecture of social behavior. Across both species, social-living individuals consistently upregulated pathways involved in translation, protein homeostasis, and energy metabolism, whereas solitary individuals showed enrichment of neuronal morphogenesis, cell adhesion, and structural plasticity. Remarkably, these same functional programs were associated with the independent evolution of sociality, revealing a strong overlap between evolutionary and plastic transcriptional responses. This convergence was largely restricted to the telencephalon, while the diencephalon showed limited and inconsistent functional signatures. Together, our results support the repeated recruitment of gene regulatory programs during the evolution of sociality and demonstrate that behavioral plasticity and evolutionary transitions share common neurogenomic responses, consistent with a conserved genetic toolkit for social behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗