Crop raiding as an emerging threat to giraffes: drivers and perceived effectiveness of countermeasures

Abstract

Giraffes, unlike other large mammals, typically pose minimal risk to humans, their animals, and crops, so they are traditionally not involved in human-wildlife conflict. Tree crops, however, are expanding across Africa, resulting in crop raiding by giraffes and retaliatory snaring, poaching, and killing of giraffes in response. The dynamics of giraffe crop raiding, however, are poorly understood, making effective interventions difficult to implement. To better understand key factors for humans and giraffes that mediate crop raiding, we used a multi-method approach to estimate giraffe abundance and activity, understand farmers perceptions and decisions, and test countermeasures around Garissa Giraffe Sanctuary in eastern Kenya. We hypothesized that 1) giraffe farm invasion would occur in dry seasons, 2) farms growing mangoes would be more likely to be invaded, 3) reducing invasion with only physical barriers would be less effective than adding behavior-based countermeasures, 4) perceptions would match giraffe activity and 5) countermeasure adoption would be driven by cost. We found that invasion and crop raiding primarily occur during the dry season and are associated with mangoes. Farmers are using many countermeasures. Effective countermeasures target giraffe behavior combined with physical barriers. Countermeasures are most effective when negative associations with humans are reinforced. Floodlights and speakers that play predator calls both reduce invasion, but only if used consistently. Overall, farmers perceptions matched giraffe dynamics. Availability was the most important factor in farmers willingness to try a countermeasure. Our results suggest that conflict can be reduced and there is interest from farmers in doing so, but use of countermeasures should be consistently applied and supported by making necessary equipment and instructions available.