Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.29.721599

Secondary structure distances reveal a new dimension of protein evolution

Abstract

Molecular phylogenetics based on primary sequence comparisons has been central to reconstructing protein evolution. However, structural evolution does not necessarily parallel sequence divergence, particularly in proteins combining ordered domains with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Here, we introduce a quantitative secondary structure distance (S2D) metric that enables systematic comparison of protein secondary structure, including both ordered elements and IDRs. Using the MADS-box transcription factor family as a model, we show that structural divergence is domain-specific and only partially coupled to sequence-based phylogeny. Domain-resolved analyses reveal that the DNA-binding M domain remains structurally constrained, whereas the I and C domains exhibit extensive sequence divergence while retaining conserved intrinsic disorder. In contrast, the K domain contributes disproportionately to global structural variability. Integrating S2D with phylogenetic distance uncovers both convergent structural architectures among distantly related proteins and pronounced structural remodelling within closely related paralogs--patterns not evident from primary sequence comparisons alone. Residue-level analyses further demonstrate that the structural impact of mutation depends strongly on amino acid identity and does not scale directly with substitution frequency or conservation metrics. Together, these findings indicate that secondary structural evolution provides an additional dimension of protein diversification beyond sequence divergence. By integrating phylogenetic and structural distances, this framework offers a complementary approach to interpreting protein evolution, particularly in families containing mixtures of ordered domains and intrinsically disordered regions. Significance StatementEvolutionary relationships are typically inferred from primary sequence comparisons, yet structural evolution may follow different trajectories. By developing a quantitative measure of secondary structural divergence, we show that structural change within the MADS-box transcription factor family can both converge and diverge independently of sequence-based phylogeny. Intrinsically disordered regions exhibit extensive sequence divergence while retaining conserved disorder, whereas specific amino acid substitutions disproportionately reshape secondary structure. These findings demonstrate that evolutionary diversification operates through domain-specific structural modulation rather than uniform sequence divergence. Integrating structural and phylogenetic distances provides a complementary framework for interpreting protein evolution and reveals evolutionary patterns that remain hidden when relying on sequence comparisons alone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bastida, A., Mun oz Morales, A. M., Egea-Cortines, M.. 2026-05-01. Secondary structure distances reveal a new dimension of protein evolution. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.29.721599

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗