Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.22.720210

Cross-Species Adaptation of RETFound for Rodent OCT Age Estimation Reveals Strong CNN Baselines in Data-Scarce Space Biology

Abstract

Space-biology imaging studies are often constrained by severe data scarcity, limiting the development of robust machine-learning biomarkers. Rodent spaceflight and space-analog datasets provide an important preclinical setting for testing transfer-learning strategies, but the extent to which human retinal foundation models can generalize to rodent optical coherence tomography (OCT) remains unclear. Here, we benchmark cross-species adaptation of RETFound, a human retinal Vision Transformer pretrained on 1.6 million retinal images, for chronological age prediction from Brown Norway rat OCT B-scans in the NASA Open Science Data Repository dataset OSD-679. We adapted RETFound using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and evaluated performance on control animals under matched 3-fold rat-level cross-validation. We compared RETFound+LoRA with a strong ImageNet-pretrained Xception baseline under matched protocols and included a scratch/random ViT as a supplementary negative-control architecture check. Metrics included mean absolute error (MAE), R2, and inter-eye mean absolute difference (MAD). RETFound+LoRA achieved MAE = 26.20 {+/-} 5.03 days with R2 = 0.744 {+/-} 0.049. However, Xception performed better in the primary benchmark (MAE = 19.01 {+/-} 7.67 days, R2 = 0.853 {+/-} 0.082), and the matched-fold comparison favored Xception, although this result should be interpreted cautiously given the small number of folds. Inter-eye consistency was maintained across the matched control evaluation, and saliency maps localized model attention to anatomically plausible inner retinal regions. Together, these results show that human retinal foundation models can transfer to rodent OCT in a scientifically useful way, but also that strong CNN baselines may outperform transformer-based models in small-sample cross-species settings. This preprint provides a reproducible benchmark and baseline framework for future retinal biomarker development in space biology. Significance StatementSpace-biology imaging studies are intrinsically data-limited. This preprint provides a reproducible cross-species benchmark for adapting Earth-trained retinal models to rodent OCT under small-sample conditions, highlights the value of strong CNN baselines, and offers a reusable starting point for future retinal biomarker development in space-relevant datasets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hayati, A., Gong, J., Nagesh, V., Avci, P., Ong, A. Y., Masalkhi, M., Engelmann, J., Karouia, F., Scott, R. T., Keane, P. A., Costes, S. V., Sanders, L. M.. 2026-04-26. Cross-Species Adaptation of RETFound for Rodent OCT Age Estimation Reveals Strong CNN Baselines in Data-Scarce Space Biology. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.22.720210

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗