Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.17.719071

The AGEF-1/ARF-1 GTPase/AP-1 trafficking pathway differentially regulates LIN-12/Notch signaling in a tissue specific manner in C. elegans

Abstract

LIN-12/Notch signaling regulates C. elegans vulval development via cell fate specifications in the gonad and epidermis. In the somatic gonad LIN-12/Notch activity specifies the anchor cell (AC) versus ventral uterine cell (VU) fates, with VU receiving more signal. The AC secretes epidermal growth factor (EGF) which induces the underlying vulval precursor cells (VPCs) to adopt vulval fates. In the VPCs the secondary vulval fates are specified by LIN-12/Notch activity. We previously reported that the AGEF-1, an Arf GEF homologous to ArfGEF1 and ArfGEF2, the ARF-1 GTPase, and the adaptor protein complex 1 (AP-1) inhibit LET-23/EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling in the VPCs by antagonizing LET-23/EGFR basolateral localization. Here we report that AGEF-1, ARF-1 and AP-1 regulate LIN-12/Notch signaling during somatic gonad and vulval development. The lin-12(n302) partial gain-of-function causes a potent Vulvaless phenotype due to a lack of AC specification. We demonstrate that loss of AGEF-1, ARF-1 or AP-1 restored the AC fate in lin-12(n302) animals, indicating that AGEF-1/ARF-1/AP-1 promotes LIN-12/Notch signaling in the somatic gonad. Interestingly, loss of AGEF-1, ARF-1 or AP-1 also induced ectopic vulval secondary fates in lin-12(n302) animals, indicating that AGEF-1/ARF-1/AP-1 inhibits LIN-12/Notch in the VPCs. Using a LIN-12/Notch biosensor we demonstrate that loss of UNC-101/AP-1 results in decreased signaling in the VU cell and increased signaling in the VPCs that correspond with decreased expression levels of LIN-12/Notch and LAG-1/DSL ligand in the presumptive AC and VU while also causing increased apical localization of LIN-12/Notch in the VPCs. We hypothesize that the differential regulation of LIN-12/Notch signaling could reflect different trafficking pathways in epithelial cells (VPCs) versus non-epithelial cells (AC and VU). Our results indicate that the AGEF-1/ARF-1/AP-1 trafficking pathway maintains the VPC cell fate patterning by limiting both LET-23/EGFR and LIN-12/Notch signaling. Author summaryCell signaling and membrane trafficking are highly interconnected processes whereby membrane trafficking can regulate signal transduction pathways and vice versa. We previously demonstrated that the ARF-1 GTPase, the downstream AP-1 clathrin adaptor and upstream activator AGEF-1 antagonize the membrane trafficking of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and hence signaling during C. elegans vulva induction. Strong loss of the ARF-1 GTPase pathway resulted in ectopic vulval induction. Here we demonstrate that the ARF-1 GTPase pathway differentially regulates Notch signaling to regulate vulva induction. In the somatic gonad it promotes Notch signaling to regulate the specification of the anchor cell which secretes the inductive signal. In the vulva precursor cells, the ARF-1 GTPase pathway antagonizes Notch signaling which cooperates with EGFR signaling to induce the vulval cell fates. We hypothesize that the differential regulation of Notch signaling by the ARF-1 GTPase pathway could be a result of more complex membrane trafficking pathways in polarized epithelial cells (vulva precursors) versus non-epithelial cells in the developing somatic gonad. Thus, the AGEF-1/ARF-1/AP-1 antagonizes both EGFR and Notch signaling in ensuring that only three of the six vulval precursor cells adopt are induced.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kato, T., FitzPatrick, C., Siyoofi, S., Zhu, H., Taguedong, E., Skorobogata, O., Rocheleau, C. E.. 2026-04-21. The AGEF-1/ARF-1 GTPase/AP-1 trafficking pathway differentially regulates LIN-12/Notch signaling in a tissue specific manner in C. elegans. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.17.719071

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗