A standardized framework resolves ambiguity in motor neuron loss across neurodegenerative diseases

Abstract

Motor neuron (MN) loss is a hallmark of neurodegenerative disorders, yet its assessment remains variable, confounding mechanistic and therapeutic interpretation. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) mouse studies, revealing 60% variability in reported MN loss, largely attributable to nonspecific spinal cord sampling. Using a whole-segment approach with tissue clearing, MN tracing, and multimodal imaging, we confirmed segment-dependent differences in MN counts. Common MN markers (SMI-32, Nissl) lacked specificity, whereas choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) provided robust labeling in murine and human spinal cords. Deep learning-based whole-mount segmentation enabled unbiased MN quantification and validated manual counts. Integrating analysis with computational modeling established segment sampling as a key driver of variability and revealed degeneration patterns: widespread MN loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), selective MN loss in severe SMA, and preservation in mild SMA models. These findings establish a framework for reproducible MN quantification. HighlightsO_LISpinal cord segment-specific analysis reduces variability and allows accurate MN quantification C_LIO_LIChAT is the most reliable MN marker in murine and human spinal cords C_LIO_LIDeep learning-based segmentation enables unbiased MN quantification in intact spinal cords C_LIO_LIMN degeneration is widespread in ALS but restricted to pools innervating proximal muscles in severe SMA C_LI