Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.10.717709

Predicting Pre-treatment Resistance or Post-treatment Effect? A Systematic Benchmarking of Single-Cell Drug Response Models

Abstract

Intratumoral heterogeneity drives variable drug responses in cancer. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables characterization of such heterogeneity and prediction of drug response at single-cell resolution. Accordingly, various computational models have been developed to infer drug response from scRNA-seq data. However, their performance, robustness, and generalizability across different biological contexts remain insufficiently evaluated. To address this gap, we benchmarked representative single-cell drug response prediction models using 26 curated datasets comprising over 760,000 cells across 12 cancer types and 21 therapeutic agents. We constructed balanced and imbalanced scenarios to reflect realistic drug-response label distributions. To address the lack of ground-truth labels in conventional scRNA-seq datasets, we incorporated lineage-tracing data with experimentally validated drug-response annotations, enabling evaluation in a clinically relevant pre-treatment prediction setting. Our results show that prediction performance was markedly higher in cell lines than in tissue samples. Under imbalanced conditions, most methods exhibited sharp performance declines, whereas scDEAL demonstrated the highest robustness. Independent validation using an in-house pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma dataset further confirmed scDEALs robustness and ability to capture biologically meaningful state transitions. Label-substitution experiment revealed that this robustness was partially driven by the models specific training-label construction. However, benchmarking with lineage-tracing data revealed a fundamental limitation: most models capture drug-induced transcriptional changes but struggled to predict intrinsic resistance before treatment. In summary, our study defines the performance boundaries of current approaches and highlights their limitations in addressing intratumoral heterogeneity, class imbalance, and intrinsic resistance prediction, emphasizing the need for the next-generation single-cell drug response models with stronger clinical relevance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shen, L., Sun, X., Zheng, S., Hashmi, A., Eriksson, J., Mustonen, H., Seppänen, H., Shen, B., Li, M., Vähä-Koskela, M., Tang, J.. 2026-04-14. Predicting Pre-treatment Resistance or Post-treatment Effect? A Systematic Benchmarking of Single-Cell Drug Response Models. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.10.717709

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗