Sustaining Control and Agency Under Threat: Computational Pathways to Persistence and Escape

Abstract

Significance StatementAdaptive behavior depends on knowing when to persist and when to let go; even when letting go appears as avoidance. While classical accounts of avoidance emphasize reward-effort trade-offs, we show that these decisions are critically guided by meta-control and inferences about outcome controllability and agency. Using a novel paradigm, we dissociate drivers of avoidance and demonstrate that threat does not uniformly promote disengagement. When outcome control is preserved, threat instead increases persistence, particularly following experiences that build agency in failure-safe contexts. We formalize these dynamics in the Meta-Arbitration of Control and Agency Q-learning (MACA-Q) model, which captures how experience-dependent beliefs about agency guide learning and choice across contexts. Our results show that similar avoidance behaviors can arise from distinct computational pathways. This shifts the focus from global avoidance biases to the dynamic regulation of agency as a core principle of adaptive behavior, with implications for neuroscience, psychiatry, and adaptive artificial intelligence. Adaptive behavior requires deciding when to persist and when to disengage under uncertainty and partial outcome control. Avoidance has often been studied as a response to threat or cost, yet existing paradigms cannot disentangle whether disengagement reflects threat sensitivity, expected failure, or reduced perceived control. We introduce a persistence-escape paradigm that independently manipulates incentive structures, effort demands, and outcome controllability. In a large online sample (N = 457), we show that avoidance is context-dependent rather than a stable, global trait. When outcome control was preserved under threat, the typical avoidance response reversed, promoting persistence rather than withdrawal. At the individual level, high-performing individuals were not uniformly more persistent, but more selective, disengaging when control was low. Moreover, higher anxiety symptoms were linked to cost-dominant evaluation and reduced use of accumulated competence. Conversely, higher depressive symptoms were linked to diminished sensitivity to effort and higher expected failure. To explain these behavioral patterns, we developed the Meta-Arbitration of Control and Agency Q-learning (MACA-Q) model, which embeds value learning and affective evaluation within a meta-control architecture. Critically, we formalize agency as a dynamically inferred learning gate, distinct from self-efficacy, that determines whether outcomes are treated as informative based on controllability and feedback reliability. The model explains context-specific avoidance and reveals that similar behaviors can arise from distinct computational pathways. It further shows how experience in failure-safe contexts guides subsequent behavior in adverse contexts. Our findings show that avoidance is guided by the dynamic regulation of engagement based on inferred controllability and competence. By combining a novel paradigm with a computational model, we provide a formal account of agency and a unifying framework in which meta-control regulates adaptive and maladaptive engagement across contexts, with implications for neuroscience, psychiatry, and adaptive artificial intelligence.