Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.01.715099

STI1 domains coordinate partitioning of UBQLN2 into stress-induced condensates

Abstract

UBQLN2 is a ubiquitin-binding shuttle protein that undergoes phase separation in vitro and localizes to stress-induced cellular condensates including stress granules. The central region of UBQLN2 contains two chaperone- and substrate-binding STI1 domains (STI1-I, STI1-II) and disordered linkers; the individual contributions of these domains and linkers to cellular condensate partitioning remain poorly characterized. Here we use live-cell imaging and immunofluorescence experiments to systematically examine domain requirements for UBQLN2 puncta formation in cultured human cells. We show that in vitro phase separation propensity largely correlates with puncta formation in transfected cells. Importantly, STI1-II and UBA domains are each required for baseline puncta formation in cells, but not STI1-I. In contrast, both STI1 domains are required for heat stress-induced puncta formation. Removal of STI1-II abrogates this stress response, and STI1-I deletion substantially attenuates it. Using N-terminal truncation constructs, we demonstrate that STI1-I strongly promotes both phase separation and puncta formation in the absence of the N-terminal region containing the UBL domain. Together, our findings demonstrate that the two STI1 domains of UBQLN2 have distinct roles in puncta formation and condensate partitioning, with STI1-II essential under all conditions. HighlightsO_LIUBQLN2 is recruited to both stress granules and puncta formed by the autophagy receptor protein p62 in response to heat stress. C_LIO_LIBoth endogenous and overexpressed UBQLN2 tend to colocalize with p62 puncta in cells where p62 is abundant, even without acute stress treatment. C_LIO_LIUsing an extensive domain deletion library, ability of UBQLN2 constructs to form puncta correlates with their in vitro phase separation propensity in the absence of stress. C_LIO_LIEach of the two STI1 domains contribute non-redundantly to formation of UBQLN2 puncta in response to heat stress. C_LIO_LIThe STI1-II domain is independently required for UBQLN2 oligomerization, phase separation, and puncta formation. C_LI

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haws, B., Dao, T. P., Varner, B., Jones, H. B., Brown, M. P., Castaneda, C. A.. 2026-04-03. STI1 domains coordinate partitioning of UBQLN2 into stress-induced condensates. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715099

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗