Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.03.30.715237

Explainable protein-protein binding affinity prediction via fine-tuning protein language models

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions underpin virtually every aspect of cellular life, and the precise quantification of their binding affinity is fundamental to understanding immune recognition, disease mechanisms, and the rational design of therapeutic antibodies. Yet predicting binding affinity at scale remains an unsolved challenge: reliable experimental assays are low-throughput and expensive, while computational methods that depend on three-dimensional complex struc-tures cannot be applied to the vast majority of clinically relevant targets where structural data are absent. Here we present BALM-PPI, a framework that predicts protein-protein binding affinity from amino acid sequence alone. Both proteins are encoded by a protein language model trained on evolutionary sequence data and projected into a shared representational space, where their distance directly reflects binding strength. Fine-tuning this protein language model requires updating fewer than 1% of its parameters, and we show that this targeted adaptation steers the model toward interface-relevant sequence signals rather than spurious background correlations. On a curated benchmark of over 12,000 protein complexes, BALM-PPI matches or exceeds the accuracy of structure-based methods and retains predictive power for proteins with less than 30% sequence identity to the training set. Using only a subset of project-specific assay data, BALM-PPI outperforms a recent method trained on three times the data, suggesting that the model has already encoded the underlying interaction signals and requires only minimal supervision to specialise to a new target. BALM-PPI further provides residue-level attribution maps that pinpoint the amino acid positions driving each affinity prediction, consistently re-covering experimentally validated interaction hotspots across enzyme-inhibitor, signalling, and antibody-antigen systems without any structural input during training. This allows predictions to be cross-validated against structural and mutagenesis evidence, providing a mechanistic basis for candidate shortlisting ahead of experimental follow-up. BALM-PPI is freely accessible via an interactive web server.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Singh, H., SINGH, R. K., Srivastava, S. P., Pradhan, S., Gorantla, R.. 2026-04-01. Explainable protein-protein binding affinity prediction via fine-tuning protein language models. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715237

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗