Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.03.12.711443

FLASH Radiotherapy is faster than a heartbeat: A compartmental model to illustrate the interplay between tissue oxygen perfusion and ultra-high dose rate effects.

Abstract

Ultra-high-dose-rate therapy enhances the protection of normal tissues and reduces side effects while effectively controlling tumors. This biological phenomenon is called the FLASH effect, and when observed, therapy is called FLASH Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT). Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain how ultra-high dose rates achieve these effects under different conditions, with the impact of tissue oxygen perfusion still needing further investigation. FLASH-RT involves brief exposure to radiation, which results in fewer heartbeats occurring during the irradiation period, which could lead to reduced tissue oxygen perfusion occurring during the treatment timeframe. Therefore, we developed a compartmental model to simulate oxygen transfer and its interaction with radiation. The proposed model consists of three compartments: 1) the heart and arteries; 2) the irradiated brains blood vessels and capillaries; and 3) the irradiated brain tissue. We employed a system of differential equations, incorporating experimental data from in vivo oxygen measurements using the Oxyphor probe in the brain, to fit the model parameters to the experimental results. This model shows how dose rate and oxygen perfusion could influence chemical processes such as lipid peroxidation, potentially leading to differential biological effects. Our analysis of lipid peroxidation as a function of dose rate revealed a sigmoidal dose-rate-response curve that correlates well with several published biological response datasets. Our results indicate that the differential chemical effects of FLASH-RT compared with conventional dose rates may depend on factors such as oxygen perfusion, consumption, and tissue oxygen tension. This suggests that the temporal dynamics of oxygen could play a crucial role in enhancing the therapeutic window for FLASH-RT treatments. Furthermore, it suggests that the magnitude of some observed FLASH effects may vary across tissues or tumors and across experimental models, given differential oxygen dynamics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ballesteros-Zebadua, P., Jansen, J., Grilij, V., Franco-Perez, J., Vozenin, M.-C., Abolfath, R.. 2026-03-16. FLASH Radiotherapy is faster than a heartbeat: A compartmental model to illustrate the interplay between tissue oxygen perfusion and ultra-high dose rate effects.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.12.711443

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Structure of influenza D virus NS1 reveals a novel Zn-binding site and ssRNA-binding activity

Influenza D virus (IDV) is an emerging pathogen associated with bovine respiratory disease and has potential for zoonotic transmission. Although nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) is a major virulence factor in influenza A and B viruses, the structure and function of IDV NS1 remain poorly defined. Here, we determined crystal structures of the IDV NS1 N-terminal RNA-binding domain (NTD) and C-terminal effector domain (CTD). The NTD retains the conserved homodimeric six-helix fold, whereas the CTD adopts a distinct architecture containing a novel Zn2+-binding site. IDV NS1 CTD preferentially binds single-stranded RNA, and mutagenesis identified lysine and arginine residues critical for this activity. Single-residue substitutions disrupting either the Zn2+-binding site or RNA-binding interface prevented recovery of infectious recombinant IDV. These findings reveal distinct structural and functional features of IDV NS1 and establish the importance of CTD integrity for viral replication. Conservation of key CTD residues in influenza C virus NS1 suggests shared structural features that distinguish influenza C and D virus NS1 proteins from their influenza A and B counterparts.

biochemistry↗

Recognition of the centromere-binding protein Ndc10 by Scm3HJURP directs Cse4CENP-A deposition at native centromeres

Kinetochores connect centromeres to spindle microtubules, ensuring accurate chromosome segregation. Kinetochore assembly at centromeres depends on deposition of CENP-A, a histone H3 variant. Despite considerable progress, how CENP-A is specifically assembled on native centromeres remains an open question. Centromere-specific assembly of CENP-A occurs spontaneously in a cell-free extract system from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but with low efficiency, suggesting that one or more factors are limiting. Here, we show Scm3HJURP, a specific chaperone for the centromeric histone Cse4CENP-A, is one such limiting component. The addition of a complex of Scm3, Cse4 and histone H4 strongly stimulates Cse4 assembly in a centromeric DNA sequence- and dose-dependent manner; in addition, improvements in both Cse4 and kinetochore assembly were more prominent in mitotic versus interphase (G1) extracts. Using the complemented cell-free reconstitution system, we show that distinct Scm3 interfaces with Cse4 and with the Ndc10 subunit of the yeast centromere DNA sequence-recognizing CBF3 complex are essential for centromere-specific Cse4 assembly and cell viability. Thus, recognition of Ndc10 directs Scm3-dependent and locus-specific centromeric histone deposition.

biochemistry↗

Heterogeneous primary nucleation determines Aβ42 fibrilstructure.

The current developments in the field of amyloid fibril structure determination has revealed multiple structures for peptides of identical sequence. This may reflect variations in sample environment or similar nucleation barriers for multiple folds. Here we investigate the influence of aggregating surface and during fibril formation from monomeric amyloid {beta} peptide (A{beta}42). The fibril structures formed in identical solutions in glass vials / bottles and PEGylated polystyrene 96-well plates display very different monomer fold within the fibrils. This is a clear indication of extremely slow homogeneous primary nucleation. Instead, heterogeneous primary nucleation at vessel walls or at the three-line interface between air, water and vessel wall dictate the outcome in each solution, where the initially formed structure is propagated through elongation and secondary nucleation. The results further imply that the conversion towards the thermodynamically stable fibril structure one is slow for A{beta}42.

biochemistry↗