Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.03.11.710413

Stress-Enhanced Fear Learning (SEFL) is Associated with Enhanced Reactivation of Fear Engrams in Ventral but not Dorsal Dentate Gyrus

Abstract

Traumatic stress can cause long-lasting changes in cognition and affect, sometimes leading to diagnoses such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The stress-enhanced fear learning (SEFL) model recapitulates understudied components of PTSD, such as stress-induced sensitization of fear learning. The SEFL procedure entails exposing mice to footshock stress followed later by fear conditioning in a different context. When tested later for recall of fear conditioning, previously stressed mice exhibit enhanced freezing compared to non-stressed controls. Studies have shown that dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus (DG) generates neural ensemble representations of contextual fear, such that fear recall involves reactivation of a sparse set of "engram cells" that were active during fear memory acquisition. How stress affects these hippocampal ensemble representations is unknown. We used SEFL and activity-dependent neuronal tagging with FosTRAP2 mice to investigate effects of stress on fear memory ensembles in rostral and caudal hippocampal DG. FosTRAP2/Ai6 mice received footshock stress or equivalent context exposure without shock in Context A on day 1. Five days later, mice received 1-shock conditioning in Context B and immediately received an injection of 4-OHT (55mg/kg) to tag fear acquisition neurons with the zsGreen reporter. One day later, mice were tested for fear recall in Context B and were perfused 90 minutes after testing. Confirming prior studies, prior stress potentiated 1-shock conditioning in Context B, with stressed mice displaying higher freezing in the Context B test session than non-stressed mice. At the level of neural activity, results showed stress had no effect on the number of zsGreen+ fear ensemble cells or the number of cfos+ recall-activated cells in rostral or caudal DG. However, stress increased reactivation (percentage of zsGreen+ cells expressing cfos) in the caudal but not rostral DG. The results suggest stress potentiates later fear learning by enhancing fear representations in caudal hippocampus, a region of the hippocampus specialized for integrating emotional and motivational valence into memory.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paredes, D., Drew, M. R.. 2026-03-13. Stress-Enhanced Fear Learning (SEFL) is Associated with Enhanced Reactivation of Fear Engrams in Ventral but not Dorsal Dentate Gyrus. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.11.710413

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗