Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.03.09.707383

A DNA foundation model predicts osteoporosis risk genes without proximity bias

Abstract

Targets supported by human genetic associations are more than twice as likely to progress from clinical development to approval. Genome-wide association studies are the largest source of genetic evidence for disease risk but linking non-coding variants to effector genes remains a significant barrier to identifying causal targets. Current gene-mapping approaches suffer from proximity bias, largely ignoring distal genes. Here we introduce Rosalind, a DNA foundation model fine-tuned on human genetic variation from GTEx, that directly predicts variant-gene regulatory relationships from sequence without relying on nearest-gene heuristics. We demonstrate Rosalinds accuracy through extensive benchmarking, apply it to multiple complex traits to establish broad utility, and provide experimental validation in osteoporosis using a translational osteoblast assay. We demonstrate that genes distal to osteoporosis risk variants were significantly more likely to alter a bone formation phenotype than nearest genes. Together, these results highlight deep learning-based regulatory models as a general and scalable framework for translating novel genetic insights to drug discovery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Regep, C., Kapourani, C.-A., Sofyali, E., Dobrowolska, A., Loukas, G., Anighoro, A., Canale, E., Gross, T., Licciardello, M., Gupta, R., Maciuca, S., Desai, T., Del Vecchio, A., Field, C., Gemayel, K., Javer, A., Zhang, Z., Tsujikawa, R., Inoue, F., Hessel, E., Taylor-King, J., Whittaker, J., Roblin, D., McIntyre, R., Edwards, L.. 2026-03-12. A DNA foundation model predicts osteoporosis risk genes without proximity bias. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.09.707383

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Genetic ancestry influences the relative expression of ancestral haplotypes within admixed individuals

Allele-specific expression (ASE) reflects differences between the two haplotypes a person carries, but most ASE studies have been done in European-descent samples. Admixed individuals carry haplotypes from different ancestral backgrounds within the same cell, which allows ancestry effects on regulation to be measured directly. We integrated phased whole-blood RNA-seq with local ancestry inference in 779 participants from the MAGENTA cohort, including non-Hispanic White, African American, Caribbean Hispanic, and Peruvian individuals. Higher West African (YRI) ancestry proportion was associated with more ASE-positive genes per person, and the association remained after adjusting for age, sex, Alzheimer's disease status, APOE genotype, and the number of heterozygous genes. Peruvian ancestry showed no significant association. A gene-level test of imbalance across population groups found 2,053 of 15,008 genes with significant differences, including the major histocompatibility complex in all four groups. A genome-wide scan of 2,213 1 Mb windows compared people carrying two haplotypes of different ancestries with those carrying two of the same ancestry. It identified 52 non-redundant loci that replicated across all four population groups, containing 201, 60, and 110 ancestry-associated genes under the CEU, YRI, and PEL reference baselines. A haplotype-resolved directional analysis showed no genome-wide advantage for either ancestry. It found locus-specific dominance at 11 loci, and only chr8:2-3 Mb (CSMD1) showed the same direction in more than one population group. Genetic ancestry therefore shapes allelic regulation at global, gene, and locus scales.

genetics↗

Assembly-independent measurement of human Yq12 heterochromatin reveals population-scale variation and Yq12-derived RNA in testis

Despite advances in long-read sequencing and telomere-to-telomere assembly, population-scale analysis of large satellite arrays remains challenging. Human Yq12 is a megabase-scale heterochromatic region composed primarily of DYZ1/HSat3A6 and DYZ2/HSat1B repeats, whose near-equal proportions are maintained despite extensive variation in total array length. Here, using complete Y-chromosome assemblies, we developed k-mer-based tools to estimate Yq12 size directly from short- and long-read sequencing data without requiring sample-specific complete assemblies. Across 1,597 males from the 1000 Genomes Project, Yq12 length ranged from ~1 to 52 Mb (mean 26.5 Mb) and varied substantially within and between Y haplogroups. Phylogenetic analyses supported long-term constraint of total Yq12 length near an equilibrium of 26 Mb and strongly coupled evolution of DYZ1 and DYZ2 around near-parity composition. In 303 father-son pairs, fathers had longer estimated Yq12 regions in 70.6% of pairs, while sons more often showed DYZ1:DYZ2 ratios closer to 1:1. Testis Iso-Seq identified transcripts containing DYZ1 and DYZ2 satellite sequences, while single-cell RNA-seq revealed their expression in haploid spermatids. These results establish a scalable framework for studying Yq12 population variation, intergenerational dynamics, and transcription, providing new opportunities to investigate how extreme satellite-array variation relates to Y-chromosome evolution and male germ-cell biology.

genetics↗

Continuous ancestry profiles from genomes and genealogies

Using a single population label to represent an individual's ancestry may offer convenience, but ancestry is multidimensional, continuous, and reflects contributions from multiple ancestral sources. Here, we demonstrate empirically that ancestry profiles outperform categorical ancestry labels in capturing this complexity. Relatedness among 28,332 genotyped individuals was measured using haplotype painting and ordination and was regressed on regional ancestry proportions from the deep genealogies available for one-third of the cohort. When tested on participants in a validation set, predicted profiles placed 78% of documented ancestry in the correct region, against 48% for the training set average. Giving each participant a single regional label placed only 32% of their documented ancestry correctly, and a perfect classifier naming each person's largest documented region would reach only 38%, because most individuals carry ancestry from several regions. Thus, the continuous profile captures substantially more ancestry than any classification, providing support for representing ancestry as a continuum rather than a label.

genetics↗