Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.02.25.707435

Optimizing the multivariate temporal response function(mTRF) framework for better identification of neural responses to partially dependent speech variables

Abstract

An increasingly popular approach to investigating the neural bases of speech processing is forward modeling via a multivariate temporal-response function (mTRF). This approach uses stimulus characteristics to predict neural responses, especially in EEG and MEG. A central question in this regard is how best to represent the input stimulus. In the case of speech processing, established representations include the speech envelope or spectrogram, as well as feature-based linguistic representations of phonetic content. However, when multiple representations are used as input, a key challenge is how best to isolate their relative effects. This is particularly challenging because such representations have nonvanishing mutual information. To address this problem, we propose optimizations to the mTRF framework via a novel statistical approach of cyclic permutation. Additionally, we propose methodological improvements to the mTRF model targeting three key challenges: effectively managing spatial and temporal autocorrelations endemic to multi-sensor EEG data; mitigating the effects of endogenous drift; and introducing robust artifact rejection to enhance data quality. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, the novel method was applied to a novel EEG data set of natural language listening in 27 adults with normal hearing. Our data showed that including ICA decomposition, artifact rejection, and cyclic permutations in an mTRF analysis improves the isolation of neural responses specific to phonetic and acoustic input variables. Author SummarySpeech processing happens in different stages. It starts with recognizing basic sounds, then categorizes them into discrete categories called phonemes, and goes on to understanding words and sentences. The multivariate temporal response function (mTRF) is a method for predicting brain activity from different features of the speech stimulus. Features that can be used as input to the mTRF model include acoustic features, such as sound envelopes, as well as more abstract language features, such as phonemes, which are a fundamental building block of words. One problem in speech research is distinguishing neural responses to different features. This is challenging because knowing one feature of the speech stimulus enables educated guesses about others and educated predictions about how this feature will behave in the future. Both of these properties of speech make multivariate temporal statistical analysis more difficult. To address this, we propose changes to the preprocessing of the EEG recordings and a new mathematical model that uses a partially rearranged version of the features of the speech stimulus to isolate the predictive power of a particular type of speech feature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dapper, K., Hollywood, S., Dool, T., Butler, B., Joanisse, M.. 2026-02-26. Optimizing the multivariate temporal response function(mTRF) framework for better identification of neural responses to partially dependent speech variables. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.25.707435

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗