Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.02.04.703747

Opposing range-dependent interactions create complex spatial patterns of antibiotic tolerance in multispecies biofilms

Abstract

Many microbial communities form multispecies biofilms where cells interact through diffusible molecules. In these biofilms, multiple interactions, often with opposing effects, occur simultaneously, yet we lack quantitative frameworks to predict how they combine to shape community functions. Here, we hypothesized that complex spatial patterns can emerge when opposing interactions have distinct spatial ranges. To test this, we studied how two Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoproducts, HQNO and rhamnolipids, jointly modulate Staphylococcus aureus antibiotic tolerance by respectively increasing and decreasing it. Using microfluidics-based imaging, we quantified spatial-tolerance patterns at single-cell resolution and found that tolerance indeed shows a complex spatial pattern: S. aureus cells survived treatment only at intermediate distances from P. aeruginosa, while cells closer or farther away did not. Combining experiments and modelling, we showed that this remarkable pattern emerges because rhamnolipids have a stronger but short-ranged effect, while HQNO has a weaker but longer-ranged effect. We found that spatial arrangement affects overall tolerance by shifting the balance between the two opposing interactions. Finally, using bioprinting, we confirmed that HQNO and rhamnolipids modulate tolerance in highly mixed biofilms. In more segregated biofilms, spatial arrangement still strongly modulated tolerance, but independently of these compounds, suggesting additional interactions. Together, our results show that spatial-tolerance patterns emerge from the combined effect of opposing range-dependent interactions and cannot be predicted from either alone. By predicting how opposing interactions jointly determine community properties, our framework provides a foundation for understanding and ultimately engineering microbiome functions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bottacin, G., Raach, B., Fröhlich, L., Künnecke, J., Kaczmarczyk, A., Tejada-Arranz, A., Ugolini, G. S., Stocker, R., Jenal, U., Bumann, D., Dittrich, P. S., Schubert, O. T., van Vliet, S.. 2026-02-06. Opposing range-dependent interactions create complex spatial patterns of antibiotic tolerance in multispecies biofilms. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.04.703747

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗

Calibrating developmental dynamics from single-cell atlases: lineage paths outrun least-action routes

Single-cell atlases infer developmental dynamics from destructive snapshots, yet how far realized lineage paths depart from such inferred dynamics has never been measured with controls. We introduce LADD (Least-Action Developmental Dynamics), a measurement framework that learns a stochastic developmental vector field from time-series single-cell RNA-seq and computes minimum-action and minimum-time paths, together with a three-layer calibration protocol that separates genuine path deviation from the generic cost of centroid measurement, and we compare its forecasting component with optimal-transport and flow-matching methods. In the lineage-resolved Caenorhabditis elegans atlas, the raw action ratio of observed lineage-centroid trajectories to optimal paths is 3.79, yet forward-simulated ensembles of the learned model itself score 2.07, leaving a genuine excess of about two-fold. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), the observed ratio sits entirely at the model's floor. Three mechanisms that could explain the residual deviation (detours, flow-opposition, and fate-map complexity) are each excluded; what remains is speed, with lineages moving 30-43% faster along the learned flow. We report validity boundaries for temporal resolution, cross-species comparison, and energetic interpretation, delimiting where action-based trajectory comparisons are meaningful.

systems biology↗

Choice of annotation data significantly impacts automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks

Genome-scale metabolic models are valuable tools for studying metabolism in many applications, such as metabolic engineering or understanding human disease. However, curated models are available for only a limited number of organisms, and generating high-quality models for additional organisms remains a challenge. To help address this challenge, several software tools have been developed that can produce draft models in an automated fashion, but the quality of these draft models lags behind manually curated ones. Thus, there is still a need to improve these tools. Previous work has focused primarily on developing better methods for each step in the reconstruction process, such as gene annotation and gap-filling. Here, we focus on the data that underlies these methods, such as known connections between protein sequence and function. We find that changing the source of reconstruction data has a substantial impact on the contents and predictions of generated models. In fact, the source of data can have a bigger impact than the choice of reconstruction method. Additionally, we show that the reconstruction process is sensitive to the accuracy of gene annotations in the reconstruction data. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of having functional annotation data from an organism that is closely related to the one for which a model is being built. These observations highlight the importance of reconstruction data and identify principles that should be considered when selecting data for reconstruction tools.

systems biology↗