Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.01.23.701173

IGF-like growth factors that couple food sensing to developmental decisions employ different release mechanisms in a single pair of C. elegans chemosensory neurons

Abstract

Sensory neurons modulate organismal physiology and behavior in part by releasing neuropeptides and neurotrophins or growth factors, via the dense core vesicle (DCV) pathway. The precise matching of the sensory input to the identity of released vesicle cargo, and the timing and location of its release, is necessary to ensure appropriate responses. In some neurons, several neuropeptides or growth factors can be co-produced simultaneously, but found in distinct populations of vesicles. While this may permit their release independently of each other, in response to different stimuli, the responsible molecular pathways are not well understood. In C. elegans, the chemosensory ASI neuron pair expresses multiple neuropeptides and growth factors, including the structurally homologous C. elegans IGF-like growth factors DAF-28, INS-6, and INS-4, whose release in young larvae couples food sensing to the commitment to reproductive development. We find that these growth factors require separate molecular pathways for their release. While the axonal release of INS-6 protein required the Calcium-dependent Activator Protein for Secretion (CAPS/UNC-31), the release of DAF-28 was CAPS-independent. Consequently, the function of endogenous daf-28, but not that of ins-6 and ins-4, is independent of unc-31. This difference is unexpected, as CAPS/UNC-31 is thought to control the regulated pre-synaptic/axonal release of DCV cargoes in C. elegans neurons, and demonstrates a divergence in vesicle release mechanisms. In addition, we find that mechanisms for delivering vesicles to the axons are also divergent: while neuropeptide NLP-21 was dependent on the clathrin adaptor AP-3 for its selective localization to axons, four insulin/IGF-like growth factors tested - DAF-28, INS-6, INS-4, and INS-22, were AP-3-independent for either axonal localization or function. Our data uncover molecular divergence in the pathways controlling axonal localization and release of neuropeptides and growth factors, including in a single neuron. These divergent vesicle pathways provide new means for the immediate and tunable changes in neuronal outputs, in addition to the known, less immediate mechanism of differential transcriptional regulation of DCV cargoes. Future delineation of the molecular composition of these pathways is necessary to understand how neurons match organismal responses to specific sensory inputs. Graphical AbstractMolecular divergence in the pathways controlling axonal localization and release of neuropeptides and growth factors O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=174 SRC="FIGDIR/small/701173v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9cba54org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18d1881org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@43d069org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@27c7b0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Perhacs, J. M., Klabonski, L., Ying, M., Argon, Y., Gidalevitz, T.. 2026-01-25. IGF-like growth factors that couple food sensing to developmental decisions employ different release mechanisms in a single pair of C. elegans chemosensory neurons. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.23.701173

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗