Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2025.12.02.690396

Grey matter embedding of the cholinergic system

Abstract

Integrity of acetylcholine-producing basal forebrain nuclei Ch1-4 is crucial for neurocognitive functioning and grey matter decline represents a hallmark of neuropsychiatric disorders, including Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease and schizophrenia. Approaches that link brain-wide grey matter atrophy with diminished cholinergic innervation from Ch1-4 projections are required for neuroimaging of disease stages and pharmacological decisions addressing cholinergic deficits. The current study assessed human magnetic resonance imaging-based markers for cholinergic nucleus subregions and synaptic targets in healthy exploration (HCP, n = 1113) and replication (IXI, n = 587) cohorts. Ch1-3 and Ch4 were delineated at 50% cytoarchitectonic probability to determine their grey matter coupling patterns using structural covariance analyses. Spatial colocalization with vesicular acetylcholine transporter, M1-muscarinic and 4{beta}2-nicotinic receptor density quantified the correspondence with synaptic cholinergic markers. All individual-level cholinergic nucleus and target region indices showed good test-retest reliability (R [≥] 0.80) when restricted to voxels with at least 10% grey matter probability. Spatial colocalization with presynaptic acetylcholine transporters emphasized a cholinergic nature of Ch1-4 grey matter and its coupling with corticopetal projections such as amygdala, insula and cingulate cortices. Subcortical gradients of M1-muscarinic receptor density and the Ch1-3 structural covariance map, however, dominated in locations of striatal cholinergic interneurons, such as nucleus accumbens, caudate nucleus and putamen. Ch4 covaried with medial thalamus and hippocampus, while both subregions structural covariance networks converged in a posterolateral Ch4 extensions, potentially resembling subputaminal nucleus of Ayala. The results emphasize Ch1-4 morphometry as marker for acetylcholine-driven brain regions and describe neuroimaging strategies to indicate synaptic cholinergic involvement. Significance StatementPrevious studies have suggested that grey matter alterations in basal forebrain Ch1-4 nuclei indicate cholinergic deficits in neurodegenerative and psychiatric pathologies. However, the use of Ch1-4 volume as a marker of cholinergic system integrity has yet to be validated. Additionally, there is a lack of non-invasive procedures to quantify integrity of regions innervated by its cholinergic projections. Our results suggest that grey matter coupling with Ch1-4 is a sensitive cholinergic system marker, mimicking the density distribution of synaptic cholinergic innervation. Furthermore, we introduce grey matter-based target region indices, evaluate their robustness in individual participants and describe regional contributions to M1-muscarinic, 4{beta}2-nicotinic and vesicular acetylcholine transporter gradients. The study advances our understanding of cholinergic circuits in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Weuthen, A., Chopra, S., Helbing, D. L., Li, M., Besteher, B., Walter, M.. 2025-12-05. Grey matter embedding of the cholinergic system. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.02.690396

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗