Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/728501

Seroprevalence of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus Infection in some Wildlife and Cattle in Bauchi State, Nigeria

Abstract

BackgroundFoot and mouth disease (FMD) is one of the most economically important transboundary animal diseases with devastating consequence on livestock production and wildlife conservation. The objectives of the study were: to determine the seroprevalence of FMDV in wildlife and cattle and identify circulating FMDV serotypes in wildlife and identify potential risk factors that will contribute to transmission of the disease at the wildlife-livestock interface in Yankari Game Reserve and Sumu Wildlife Park in Bauchi State, Nigeria.\n\nMethodsBlood samples were collected between 2013 to 2015 from some wildlife and cattle respectively within and around Yankari Game Reserve (YGR) and Sumu Wildlife Park (SWP) in Bauchi State, Nigeria. The Wild animals were immobilized for blood collection using a combination of Etorphine Hydrochloride (M99(R) Kruger-Med South Africa) at 0.5-2 mg/kg and Azaperone (Stresnil(R), Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Pty.) Ltd., South Africa) at 0.1 mg/kg using a Dan-Inject(R) rifle (Dan-Inject APS, Sellerup Skovvej, Denmark) fitted with 3 ml dart syringe and for reversal, Naltrexone (Trexonil(R) Kruger-Med South Africa) at 1.5 mg IM was used, cattle were restrained by the owners for blood collection. Harvested Sera from blood were screened for presence of Antibodies against FMDV using prioCHECK(R) 3 ABC NSP ELISA kit and positive samples from wildlife were serotyped using Solid-Phase Competitive ELISA, (IZSLER Brescia-Italy). Data obtained were analysed using Graphpad Prism version 7.\n\nResultsThe results showed that 197 (65.7%) of the 300 serum samples from cattle and 13 (24.5%) of the 53 serum samples from wildlife tested positive for antibodies to the highly conserved non-structural 3-ABC protein of FMDV and statistically significant (P <0.05). Classification of cattle into breed and sex showed that detectable antibodies to FMDV were higher (P <0.05) in White Fulani 157 (72.8%) than red Bororo 23 (39.7%) and Sokoto Gudali 17 (33.3%) breeds of cattle whereas in females detectable FMDV antibodies were higher (P <0.05) 150 (72.8%) than in males 47 (50.0%). In the wildlife species, antibodies to FMDV were detected in waterbuck 2 (28.6%), elephant 1 (25.0%), wildebeest 4 (33.3%) and eland 6 (25.0%). Four serotypes of FMDV: O, A, SAT-1 and SAT-2 were detected from the 3-ABC positive reactors in waterbuck, elephant, wildebeest and eland. Contact of wildlife and cattle during utilization of the rich resources in the conservation areas is a potential risk factor for the spread of FMDV in the study area.\n\nConclusionsPresence of FMDV antibodies in cattle and some wildlife were observed and serotypes of FMDV: O, A, SAT-1 and SAT-2 were detected from the 3-ABC positive reactors in some of the wildlife. The study highlights the need for active surveillance of FMDV in wildlife and pastoral cattle within and around wildlife conservation areas in Nigeria. FMD surveillance system, control and prevention program that targets wildlife and livestock at the wildlife-livestock interface level will be beneficial to the livestock industry and wildlife conservation goals in Bauchi State, Nigeria.\n\nAuthor summaryFoot and mouth disease (FMD) is an important trans-boundary viral disease of both domestic and wild cloven hoofed animals characterized by high morbidity with devastating consequence on the livestock worldwide. Despite the endemic nature of FMD in Nigeria, little is known about the epidemiology of the disease at the wildlife-livestock interface level. To address this gap, blood samples were collected between 2013 to 2015 from some wildlife and cattle respectively within and around Yankari Game Reserve (YGR) and Sumu Wildlife Park (SWP) in Bauchi State, Nigeria. Wild animals were immobilized using a combination of Etorphine Hydrochloride (M99(R) Kruger-Med South Africa) at 0.5-2 mg/kg and Azaperone (Stresnil(R), Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Pty.) Ltd., South Africa) at 0.1 mg/kg using a Dan-Inject(R) rifle (Dan-Inject APS, Sellerup Skovvej, Denmark) fitted with 3 ml dart syringe and for reversal, Naltrexone (Trexonil(R) Kruger-Med South Africa) at 1.5 mg IM was used, cattle were restrained by the owners for blood collection. Harvested Sera from blood were screened for presence of Antibodies against FMDV using prioCHECK(R) 3 ABC NSP ELISA kit and positive samples were serotyped using Solid-Phase Competitive ELISA, (IZSLER Brescia-Italy). Out of the 300 and 53 sera collected from cattle and wildlife 197 (65.7%) and 13 (24.5%) (P <0.05) respectively tested positive for antibodies to the highly conserved non-structural 3-ABC protein of FMDV by the FMDV-NS blocking ELISA. Classification of cattle into breed and sex showed that detectable antibodies to FMDV were higher (P <0.05) in White Fulani 157 (72.8%) than red Bororo 23 (39.7%) and Sokoto Gudali 17 (33.3%) breeds of cattle whereas in females detectable FMDV antibodies were higher (P <0.05) 150 (72.8%) than in males 47 (50.0%). In the wildlife species, antibodies to FMDV were detected in waterbuck 2 (28.6%), elephant 1 (25.0%), wildebeest 4 (33.3%) and eland 6 (25.0%). Four serotypes of FMDV: O, A, SAT-1 and SAT-2 were detected from the 3-ABC positive reactors in waterbuck, elephant, wildebeest and elands. The results showed presence of antibodies to FMDV in some wildlife and cattle and suggest that wildlife could equally play an important role in the overall epidemiology of FMD in Nigeria. FMD surveillance system, control and prevention program should be intensified in the study area.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Atuman, Y. J., Kudi, C. A., Abdu, P. A., Okubanjo, O. O., Ularamu, H. G., Wungak, Y., Abubakar, A.. 2019-08-08. Seroprevalence of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus Infection in some Wildlife and Cattle in Bauchi State, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.1101/728501

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Auditing Biomedical Literature with Blinded AI Peer Review: Where Peer Review Works, Where It Fails, and How to Strengthen It

Biomedical publishing has grown more than elevenfold since 1991, outstripping human peer review. Unblinded language models cannot audit this literature objectively because they recognize famous authors and journals from training memory. We built BARS (Blinded AI Review System), an automated referee that strips titles, author names, institutions, journal headers, and dates before grading full-text manuscripts on a 10-point scale covering methods, evidence, biology, and reproducibility. We used BARS to generate 1,874 blind reviews across 1,714 unique papers. BARS passed 100% of verified sound controls, caught 77% to 91% of internally flawed papers, eliminated a +0.35-point prestige boost, and more than doubled human referee consistency. Across 320 recent open-access articles (2020-2025) from eight fields, 54% failed on core scientific rigor (<5.0/10; 41% excluding megajournals). Revision at selective journals improved preprints more than twice as much as revision at commercial megajournals (+0.62 vs. +0.30 points; baseline-adjusted p = 0.033), and BARS recalled 98% of unresolved human referee critiques across 100 open-review papers. Across 915 date-blinded papers from 1991 to 2025, average scores fell from 7.6/10 to 5.8/10 as megajournals and template database studies expanded. Blinded self-audits of 238 papers by two senior authors -- and of this manuscript itself -- caught real statistical, control, and table errors in our own work. At four cents per paper, BARS offers a practical quality check for authors, journals, and readers (https://veg.github.io/BARS/).

scientific communication and education↗

From Problems to Solutions: How Self-Questions Drive Strong Scientific Reasoning

Metacognition, or awareness and control of thinking, is essential for problem solving because it helps solvers select strategies for learning and decide when to enact them (planning), check their understanding in the moment (monitoring), and assess effectiveness of solutions and learning strategies (evaluating). Most studies that examine metacognition do so retrospectively, leaving a critical gap in how metacognition is used in-the-moment for problem solving. In this study, we utilized a think-aloud interview approach to capture and characterize the metacognitive skills that senior undergraduate life science students at three institution types in the United States used spontaneously while solving challenging biology problems. We found that the students (n = 39) displayed a wide variety and quantity of monitoring, some evaluating, and nearly no planning skills while creating a solution backed with high-quality reasoning. Students frequently used self-questions to monitor and evaluate their thinking. We found that self-questioning is a critical skill for generating solutions, but it only moves problem solving forward if the student asks and correctly answers the self-question out loud. This study illustrates how self-questioning and other metacognitive regulation skills provide links to bridge the gap between a student's prior knowledge and specific features of a challenging problem. Based on our student data, we conceptualized a model of metacognitive phases during problem solving with high-quality reasoning. Finally, we present a self-question scaffold to facilitate the proposed phases (planning, monitoring, reasoning, and evaluating) so educators can equip students with metacognitive and scientific reasoning tools for effective problem solving.

scientific communication and education↗

Preprint solicitation as a natural experiment in scholarly publishing

Preprinting is a growing and increasingly recognized mechanism for scientific communication and productivity and a way to facilitate global access to science. The interplay of preprinting practices with formal peer-reviewed publication is an open question that is now tractable to targeted analysis. Here, we take advantage of nearly a decade of preprint solicitation at Proceedings B to address this question, which offers a quasi-experimental setting for comparing outcomes for solicited preprints and traditionally submitted manuscripts. We used submission records from 15,368 manuscripts from 2018-2024 to assess whether preprint solicitation affects acceptance rates, journal scope, author geographic diversity, and post-publication uptake. Solicited manuscripts were accepted at nearly twice the rate of traditional submissions and received more downloads and citations after publication. Submission topics were broadly similar between the two routes, though solicited manuscripts showed marginally greater subject diversity. Geographic disparities favoring the Global North persisted, but acceptance rates for solicited manuscripts converged across regions, narrowing the gap seen in traditional submissions. These findings extend earlier work on this initiative and indicate that editor-driven solicitation can identify high-quality preprints, broaden geographic representation, and increase research visibility, offering a replicable model for journals seeking to diversify authorship while maintaining editorial standards.

scientific communication and education↗