Early-life adversity is associated with differential gene expression in response to acute psychological stress: preliminary findings

Abstract

ObjectiveExposure to early-life adversity (ELA) can result in long-term changes to physiological systems, which predispose individuals to negative health outcomes. This biological embedding of stress-responsive systems may operate via dysregulation of physiological resources in response to common stressors. The present study used a novel experimental design to test how young adults exposure to ELA influence neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses to acute stress.\n\nMaterials and methodsParticipants were 12 males (mean age= 21.25), half of whom endorsed at least three significant adverse events up to age 18 years ( ELA group), and half who confirmed zero ( controls). Using a randomized within-subjects, between-groups experimental design, we induced acute psychosocial stress (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST), and included a no-stress control condition one week apart. During these sessions, we obtained repeated measurements of physiological reactivity, gene expression of NR3C1, FKBP5 and NFKB1, and plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1{beta}, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF) over a 4-hour window post-test.\n\nResultsThe ELA group evinced significantly higher cortisol response and lower NR3C1 gene expression in response to the TSST compared with controls, while no differences were observed in the no-stress condition. Cortisol and group status interacted such that increase in cortisol predicted increase in both NR3C1 and NFKB1 expression among controls, but decrease in the ELA group. For pro-inflammatory cytokines, only IL-6 increased significantly in response to the TSST, with no differences between the two groups.\n\nConclusionOverall, we provide preliminary findings for the biological embedding of stress via a dynamic and dysregulated pattern evidenced in response to acute psychosocial stress. ELA may program physiological systems in a maladaptive manner more likely to manifest during times of duress, predisposing individuals to the negative health consequences of everyday stressors. Future studies with larger sample size including both males and females are needed to replicate these findings.