Disentangling competence from performance in behavioral measures of learning: A lesson for cognitive neuroscience

Abstract

A crucial question in skill learning research is how instruction affects the performance or the underlying representations. However, a little is known about its effect on one critical aspect of skill leaning, namely, picking-up statistical regularities. More specifically, how pre-learning speed vs. accuracy instructions affect the acquisition of non-adjacent second-order dependencies. Here, we trained two groups of participants on an implicit probabilistic sequence learning task: one group focusing on being fast and the other on being accurate. As expected, we detected strong instruction effect: accuracy instruction resulted in a nearly errorless performance, while speed instruction caused short reaction times. Despite the differences in the average reaction times and accuracy scores, we found a similar level of statistical learning in the training phase. After the training phase, we tested the two groups under the same instruction (focusing on both speed and accuracy), and they showed comparable performance, suggesting a similar level of underlying statistical representations. Our findings support that skill learning can result in robust representations, and they highlight that this form of knowledge may appear with almost errorless performance.