Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/726166

Cross-Species association statistics for genome-wide studies of host and parasite polymorphism data

Abstract

Uncovering the genes governing host-parasite coevolutionary interactions is of importance for disease management. The increasing availability of host and parasite full genome-data allows for cross-species genome-wide association studies based on the genomic data of in-fected hosts and their associated parasite strains sampled from natural populations (i.e. natural co-GWAs). Such studies focus on searching for cross-species allelic associations between pairs of host and parasite SNPs. We aim to quantify the power of natural co-GWAs to pinpoint loci under coevolution with respect to the intrinsic complexities of coevolutionary systems, such as the genetic specificity of the interaction and the temporal allele frequency changes resulting from the interaction. Therefore, we develop the cross-species association (CSA) and the cross-species prevalence (CSP) indices, the latter additionally incorporating genomic data from uninfected hosts. To provide an assessment of the statistical power of these indices, we analytically derive their genome-wide False Discovery Rates (FDR) based on the neutral site-frequency spectrum of the host and the parasite population. Using two coevolutionary models, we investigate under which parameter regimes these indices pin-point the coevolving loci. Under trench warfare dynamics, CSA and CSP are very accurate in pinpointing the loci under coevolution, while under arms race dynamics the power is limited especially for gene-for-gene interactions. Furthermore, we reveal that the combination of both indices across time samples is an indicator for the specificity of the interaction. Our results provide novel insights into the power and biological interpretation of natural cross-species association studies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maerkle, H., Tellier, A., John, S.. 2019-08-06. Cross-Species association statistics for genome-wide studies of host and parasite polymorphism data. https://doi.org/10.1101/726166

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗