Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/697821

PACVr: Plastome Assembly Coverage Visualization in R

Gruenstaeudl, M.·Jenke, N.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundThe circular, quadripartite structure of plastid genomes which includes two inverted repeat regions renders the automatic assembly of plastid genomes challenging. The correct assembly of plastid genomes is a prerequisite for the validity of subsequent analyses on plastid genome structure and evolution. Plastome-based phylogenetic or population genetic investigations, for example, require the precise identification of DNA sequence and length to determine the location of nucleotide polymorphisms. The average coverage depth of a genome assembly is often used as an indicator for assembly quality. Visualizing coverage depth across a draft genome allows users to inspect the quality of the assembly and, where applicable, identify regions of reduced assembly confidence. Based on such visualizations, users can conduct a local re-assembly or other forms of targeted error correction. Few, if any, contemporary software tools can visualize the coverage depth of a plastid genome assembly while taking its quadripartite structure into account, despite the interplay between genome structure and assembly quality. A software tool is needed that visualizes the coverage depth of a plastid genome assembly on a circular, quadripartite map of the plastid genome.\n\nResultsWe introduce PACVr, an R package that visualizes the coverage depth of a plastid genome assembly in relation to the circular, quadripartite structure of the genome as well as to the individual plastome genes. The tool allows visualizations on different scales using a variable window approach and also visualizes the equality of gene synteny in the inverted repeat regions of the plastid genome, thus providing an additional measure of assembly quality. As a tool for plastid genomics, PACVr provides the functionality to identify regions of coverage depth above or below user-defined threshold values and helps to identify non-identical IR regions. To allow easy integration into bioinformatic workflows, PACVr can be directly invoked from a Unix shell, thus facilitating its use in automated quality control. We illustrate the application of PACVr on two empirical datasets and compare the resulting visualizations with alternative software tools for displaying plastome sequencing coverage.\n\nConclusionsPACVr provides a user-friendly tool to visualize (a) the coverage depth of a plastid genome assembly on a circular, quadripartite plastome map and in relation to individual plastome genes, and (b) the equality of gene synteny in the inverted repeat regions. It, thus, contributes to optimizing plastid genome assemblies and increasing the reliability of publicly available plastome sequences, especially in light of incongruence among the visualization results of alternative software tools. The software, example datasets, technical documentation, and a tutorial are available with the package at https://github.com/michaelgruenstaeudl/PACVr.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gruenstaeudl, M., Jenke, N.. 2019-07-11. PACVr: Plastome Assembly Coverage Visualization in R. https://doi.org/10.1101/697821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗