Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/695791

The effect of competency-based education in obstetric emergencies on midwifery students in clinical skill lab, based on Kirkpatrick evaluation model: A randomized controlled trial One

kheirkhah, m.·Hakimi, M.·Abolghasemi, J.·Hakimi, R.·Farshad, f.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundObstetric emergency is one of the most important causes of maternal and neonatal mortality, and competency-based education is one of the efficient approaches to cover this. Objective structured clinical examination is one of the valid methods in measuring students competency and performance. Kirkpatrick evaluation model is a great method to assess a training impact.\n\nObjectivesThis study was designed to determine the effect of competency-based education on midwifery students based on Kirkpatrick evaluation model.\n\nDesignRandomized controlled trial\n\nSettingNursing and Midwifery School in Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran University of Medical Sciences)\n\nParticipantseighty students in third to fifth term of associate and bachelors degree in midwifery (intervention group=40, control group=40)\n\nMethodsUsing stratified random sampling, research team trained learners of intervention group in 4 sessions, 5 hours/day in a month in emergency obstetric cares. Both groups had been receiving the routine schedule of the faculty. Knowledge, skills, and self-confidence were assessed three times, before, immediately and 6 weeks after training by researcher made questionnaire, Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and self-reported questionnaire respectively. Data were analyzed with descriptive, inferential statistics.\n\nResultsThe level of knowledge, skills, and self-confidence increased significantly in the intervention group, in immediate and 6 weeks after intervention (P<0.001). In intervention group, Mean {+/-} S.D of all variables were 5.05{+/-}2.074, 143.30{+/-}12.146 and 11.65{+/-}2.045, which increased to 10.17{+/-}1.318, 527.70{+/-}19.995 and 18.97{+/-}1.980 and remained at the same levels 6 weeks later, 9.37{+/-}2.215, 521.80{+/-}19.784 and 19.00{+/-}2.631; in the control group, this trend was not significant (P=0.380, P=0.455 and P=0.191).\n\nConclusionCompetency-based education can be used in midwifery education and in-service training. We need to use new educational approaches such as competency-based to have a valuable impact on knowledge skills and self-confidence. This may affect health indexes indirectly.

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

kheirkhah, m., Hakimi, M., Abolghasemi, J., Hakimi, R., Farshad, f.. 2019-07-08. The effect of competency-based education in obstetric emergencies on midwifery students in clinical skill lab, based on Kirkpatrick evaluation model: A randomized controlled trial One. https://doi.org/10.1101/695791

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2019

Lower limb chronic edema management program: Perspectives of disengaged patients on challenges, enablers and barriers to program attendance and adherence

BackgroundChronic edema (CO) is a progressive, physically disfiguring and currently incurable condition. A multifaceted program has been recommended to manage the swelling. However, there is little evidence investigating patients perspectives following the program, particularly for those who have poor adherence or are disengaged.\n\nAimTo investigate the perceived challenges faced by disengaged participants with lower limb CO by identifying their enablers and barriers to participating in a Physiotherapy CO program.\n\nMethodAn exploratory qualitative approach was used. A purposive sampling strategy was adopted to recruit participants. Those with more than three months swelling and who had low adherence or attendance (disengaged) to the CO program were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews with six participants from a CO clinic in a tertiary hospital were conducted. Data was thematically analyzed and findings in terms of enablers and barriers were subsequently reflected in the light of a theoretical framework.\n\nResultsAll six participants were morbidly obese (BMI 47 {+/-} 4 kg/m2) with multiple chronic comorbidities. Enablers and barriers detected included physical, psychological and social factors that interplay to present multidimensional challenges that influence the participants adjustment to managing their CO. For the disengaged participants in this study, their under-managed lower limb CO was a progression towards being housebound and having a gradually increasing level of disability.\n\nConclusionChronic edema, if left unmanaged, can have a profound debilitating impact on the individual permanently. Understanding the challenges faced by patients with lower limb CO has implications for developing a more patient-centered multidisciplinary approach to clinical practice and suggests the need for further research.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2019

Genetic research at the intersection of gender identity, sexual orientation, and mental health: community attitudes and recommendations for researchers

Biological sex is an important factor in mental health, and a non-binary view of how variation in sex and gender influence mental health represents a new research frontier that may yield new insights. The recent acceleration of research into sexual orientation, gender identity, and mental health has generally been conducted without sufficient understanding of the opinions of sexual and gender minorities (SGM) toward this research. We surveyed 768 individuals, with an enrichment of LGBTQ+ stakeholders, for their opinions regarding genetic research of SGM and mental health. We found that the key predictors of attitudes toward genetic research specifically on SGM are 1) general attitudes toward genetic and mental health research 2) tolerance of SGM and associated behaviors 3) non-cisgender stakeholder status and 4) age of the respondent. Non-heterosexual stakeholder status was significantly associated with increased willingness to participate in genetic research if a biological basis for gender identity were discovered. We also found that non-stakeholders with a low tolerance for SGM indicated their SGM views would be positively updated if science showed a biological basis for their behaviors and identities. These findings represent an important first step in understanding and engaging the LGBTQ+ stakeholder community in the context of genetic research.

scientific communication and education↗