Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/688119

Risk of Seizures Induced by Intracranial Research Stimulation: Analysis of 770 Stimulation Sessions

Goldstein, H.·Smith, E.·Gross, R. E.·Jobst, B. C.·Lega, B. C.·Sperling, M. R.·Worrell, G. A.·Zaghloul, K. A.·Wanda, P. A.·Kahana, M. J.·Rizzuto, D. S.·Schevon, C. A.·McKhann, G. M.·Sheth, S. A.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with medically refractory epilepsy often undergo intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) monitoring to identify a seizure focus and determine their candidacy for surgical intervention. This clinically necessary monitoring period provides an increasingly utilized research opportunity to study human neurophysiology, however, ethical concerns demand a thorough appreciation of the associated risks.\n\nObjectiveWe measured the incidence of research stimulation-associated seizures in a large multi-institutional study on brain stimulations effect on memory in order to determine if brain stimulation was statistically associated with seizure incidence, and identify potential risk factors for stimulation-associated seizures.\n\nMethods188 subjects undergoing iEEG monitoring across 10 institutions participated in 770 research stimulation sessions over 3.5 years. Seizures within 30 minutes of a stimulation session were included in our retrospective analysis. We analyzed stimulation parameters, seizure incidence, and typical seizure patterns, to assess the likelihood that recorded seizures were stimulation-induced, rather than events that occurred by chance in epilepsy patients prone to seizing.\n\nResultsIn total, 14 seizures were included in our analysis. All events were single seizures, and no adverse events occurred. The mean amplitude of seizure-associated stimulation did not differ significantly from the mean amplitude delivered in sessions without seizures.\n\nIn order to determine the likelihood that seizures were stimulation induced, we used three sets of analyses: Visual iEEG analysis, statistical frequency, and power analyses. We determined that three of the 14 seizures were likely stimulation-induced, five were possibly stimulation-induced, and six were unlikely stimulation-induced. Overall, we estimate a rate of stimulation-induced seizures between 0.39% and 1.82% of sessions.\n\nConclusionsThe rarity of stimulation-associated seizures, and that none added morbidity or affected the clinical course of any patient, are important findings for understanding the feasibility and safety of intracranial stimulation for research purposes.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

neurosciencePreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Goldstein, H., Smith, E., Gross, R. E., Jobst, B. C., Lega, B. C., Sperling, M. R., Worrell, G. A., Zaghloul, K. A., Wanda, P. A., Kahana, M. J., Rizzuto, D. S., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., Sheth, S. A.. 2019-07-02. Risk of Seizures Induced by Intracranial Research Stimulation: Analysis of 770 Stimulation Sessions. https://doi.org/10.1101/688119

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗