Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/646406

Loss of the Alzheimer’s-linked bridging integrator 1 (BIN1) protein affects synaptic structure and disrupts tau localisation and release

Abstract

BackgroundPost-translational modifications of tau modify its interaction with binding partners and cause tau mislocalisation and altered tau function in Alzheimers disease (AD). The AD risk gene BIN1, is a binding partner for tau, however the mechanism by which BIN1 influences tau function is not fully understood. We hypothesised that BIN1 modulates AD risk by causing damaging tau mis-sorting to the synapse.\n\nMethodsTau and BIN1 levels, distribution and interactions were assessed in post-mortem control and AD brain and in primary neurons. In primary neurons, tau was further examined using structured illumination microscopy and immunoblotting following BIN1 knockdown, BIN1-tau interactions were examined using proximity ligation assays and tau release from neurons was measured by sensitive sandwich ELISA.\n\nResultsProline 216 in tau was identified as critical for tau interaction with the BIN1-SH3 domain, and tau phosphorylation at serine/threonine residues disrupted this interaction. Subcellular fractionation showed that BIN1 is lost from the cytoplasm of AD brain and this correlated with the mislocalisation of phosphorylated tau to synapses. Mimicking BIN1 loss in AD by knockdown of the protein in primary neurons altered the structure of dendritic spines, caused phosphorylated tau to mis-sort to synapses and reduced the physiological release of predominantly dephosphorylated tau.\n\nConclusionsThese data suggest that BIN1 loss in AD allows phosphorylated tau to be mis-sorted to synapses which likely alters the integrity of the post-synapse, alongside reducing the functionally important release of physiological forms of tau.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Glennon, E. B., Lau, D. H.-W., Gabriele, R. M. C., Taylor, M. F., Troakes, C., Elliott, C., Killick, R., Hanger, D. P., Perez-Nievas, B. G., Noble, W.. 2019-05-23. Loss of the Alzheimer’s-linked bridging integrator 1 (BIN1) protein affects synaptic structure and disrupts tau localisation and release. https://doi.org/10.1101/646406

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Simple, static, spiking nonlinearities can account for seemingly complex interactions between visual, motor and cognitive variables in the visual cortex.

Neural activity in the visual cortex is driven by the stimulus and modulated by multiple task-related variables, including spatial attention, eye movements, and perceptual decisions. These multiple influences are each typically described as nonlinear interactions such as gain or normalization, raising the question of how these diverse signals can be combined through cellular or circuit mechanisms. Here we address this problem by examining neuronal responses in macaque visual areas V2 and V3 during a visual discrimination task that dissociates spatial attention from motor planning and microsaccadic eye movements. Using a statistical modeling framework, we show that attentional, microsaccade-related, and choice-related influences on neural activity are best explained by a simple additive stimulus-independent input modulation, which manifests as a gain via a spiking nonlinearity. In addition to explaining how interactions between variables might be accomplished mechanistically, this framework also resolves a controversy about the relationship between microsaccades and spatial attention. We find that neither microsaccade direction nor microsaccade-related neural activity accounts for attentional modulation, although these variables are often correlated, leading to apparent interactions. Thus, visual cortex can integrate sensory, motor-related, and cognitive signals through a parsimonious mechanism that preserves stable stimulus representations while supporting flexible, context-dependent modulation.

neuroscience↗

40 Hz visual stimulation increases gamma-band functional connectivity between visual, parietal and frontal regions

Visual stimulation at 40 Hz is being investigated as a non-invasive intervention for Alzheimer's disease. Its neural responses have been reported in regions beyond the visual cortex, and concurrent cognitive tasks have been shown to increase their spatial extent. However, it is unclear whether these responses reflect increased functional connectivity between regions or a common response to the stimulus, and whether a concurrent task changes this connectivity. We recorded EEG from 29 healthy young adults during Regular 40 Hz flicker and Irregular 30-50 Hz flicker, each with and without a target-counting task (2 x 2 within-participant design). Source-space connectivity between visual, parietal, and frontal regions was estimated with the debiased squared weighted phase-lag index (dWPLI). Regular stimulation increased 38-42 Hz connectivity for all three region pairs, with the largest increase between visual and parietal regions (increase in all 29 participants). The increase was specific to the stimulation frequency and was observed with two source reconstruction methods and in sensor space. The visual-parietal increase remained significant after correction for source leakage (spatial mixing between reconstructed sources) and after removal of the estimated stimulus-locked component, whereas the increases in visual-frontal and parietal-frontal connectivity did not. The concurrent task did not modulate the visual-parietal effect. For visual-frontal and parietal-frontal connectivity, the stimulation-by-ask interaction was not significant. These results show that 40 Hz visual stimulation increases gamma-band connectivity beyond the visual cortex, and much of this increase reflects a common stimulus-locked response, and connectivity beyond this response was observed mainly between visual and parietal regions.

neuroscience↗

Feedback Valence, Prediction Error, and the Limits of Computational Attribution in Symptom-Related EEG

Feedback-locked electroencephalography (EEG) responses are often interpreted using model-derived prediction errors (PEs), although signed PE can be strongly coupled to feedback valence in binary-outcome tasks. We revisited a published anxiety-related EEG association using two open probabilistic-learning datasets to examine measurement reliability, predictor separability, and participant-level recovery. In the primary dataset, greater trait anxiety was associated with a larger negative-minus-positive FCz theta response among 46 participants with elevated depressive symptoms after adjustment for depression severity. The association also differed between the sampled depression-symptom groups. The feedback contrast showed useful within-session reliability, but matched delta and P3-minus-N2 analyses did not establish theta specificity. Within participants, feedback valence and signed PE were highly correlated (r = -0.964). Exact-design simulations showed that population-level model discrimination could succeed despite poor recovery of individual neural slopes. Participant-specific learning-model refits recovered overall signed PE more consistently than the within-valence variation needed to distinguish it from feedback valence. An independent dataset reproduced the FCz feedback contrast in untreated and placebo cohorts but lacked trait-anxiety scores. Adding signed PE to valence yielded a small held-out predictive improvement under one reinforcement-learning specification, with limited support across sessions and no comparable support under the dual-rate model or in placebo. Together, these findings support a symptom-related feedback EEG association while constraining its theta-specific and participant-level computational interpretation.

neuroscience↗