Benchmarking software tools for detecting and quantifying selection in Evolve and Resequencing studies

Abstract

The combination of experimental evolution with whole genome re-sequencing of pooled individuals, also called Evolve and Resequence (E&R) is a powerful approach to study selection processes and to infer the architecture of adaptive variation. Given the large potential of this method, a range of software tools were developed to identify selected SNPs and to measure their selection coefficients. In this benchmarking study, we are comparing 15 test statistics implemented in 10 software tools using three different scenarios. We demonstrate that the power of the methods differs among the scenarios, but some consistently outperform others. LRT-1, which takes advantage of time series data consistently performed best for all three scenarios. Nevertheless, the CMH test, which requires only two time points had almost the same performance. This benchmark study will not only facilitate the analysis of already existing data, but also affect the design of future data collections.