Honey bee (Apis mellifera) larval pheromones regulate gene expression related to foraging task specialization

Ma, R.; Rangel, J.; Grozinger, C. M.

doi:10.1101/587113

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/587113

Honey bee (Apis mellifera) larval pheromones regulate gene expression related to foraging task specialization

Ma, R.·Rangel, J.·Grozinger, C. M.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundForaging behavior in honey bees (Apis mellifera) is a complex phenotype which is regulated by physiological state and social signals. How these factors are integrated at the molecular level to modulate foraging behavior has not been well-characterized. The transition of worker bees from nursing to foraging behavior is mediated by large-scale changes in brain gene expression, which are influenced by pheromones produced by the queen and larvae. Larval pheromones can also stimulate foragers to leave the colony to collect pollen, but the mechanisms underpinning this rapid behavioral plasticity are unknown. Furthermore, the mechanisms through which foragers specialize on collecting nectar or pollen, and how larval pheromones impact these different behavioral states, remains to be determined. Here, we investigated the patterns of gene expression related to rapid behavioral plasticity and task allocation among honey bee foragers exposed to two larval pheromones, brood pheromone (BP) and (E)-beta-ocimene (EBO).\n\nResultsWe hypothesized that both pheromones would alter expression of genes in the brain related to foraging and would differentially impact expression of genes in the brains of pollen compared to nectar foragers. Combining data reduction, clustering, and network analysis methods, we found that foraging preference (nectar vs. pollen) and pheromone exposure are each associated with specific brain gene expression profiles. Furthermore, pheromone exposure has a strong transcriptional effect on genes that are preferentially expressed in nectar foragers. Representation factor analysis between our study and previous landmark honey bee transcriptome studies revealed significant overlaps for both pheromone communication and foraging task specialization.\n\nConclusionsSocial signals (i.e. pheromones) may invoke foraging-related genes to upregulate pollen foraging at both long and short time scales. These results provide new insights into how social signals integrate with task specialization at the molecular level and highlights the important role that brain gene expression plays in behavioral plasticity across time scales.

Source connections

Published article ↗

Explore related subjects

genomics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ma, R., Rangel, J., Grozinger, C. M.. 2019-03-23. Honey bee (Apis mellifera) larval pheromones regulate gene expression related to foraging task specialization. https://doi.org/10.1101/587113

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Long-read DNA sequencing reveals global hypomethylation and focal hypermethylation in SDHx-deficient pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL) are highly heritable neuroendocrine tumors of the autonomic ganglia. Genomic DNA in most cancer cells is hypomethylated. However, DNA in PPGLs secondary to mutations in succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDHx) genes is reportedly hypermethylated due to succinate-mediated inhibition of DNA demethylases. We used nanopore long-read sequencing to characterize the methylome of tumor and white blood cell DNA from SDHx and non-SDHx PPGL patients, alongside normal adrenal medulla. We find that both SDHx and non-SDHx PPGLs are globally hypomethylated, particularly at centromeres. In normal adrenal medulla, CpG islands marked by H3K4 methylation are hypomethylated, whereas CpG islands lacking H3K4 methylation are hypermethylated. In SDHx-related PPGL, some H3K4me-marked CpG islands are hypermethylated, but most are not. We propose that DNA methylation in SDHx-related PPGL reflects the global hypomethylation generally observed in tumors, partly offset by succinate-mediated inhibition of TET DNA demethylases. Opposing effects of succinate may alter the balance between DNA methylation (indirect inhibition of the DNMT3A/B DNA methylases via inhibition of H3K4me demethylases) and DNA demethylation (inhibition of TET DNA demethylases) at active CpG islands.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

High piRNA abundance is a hallmark of evolutionarily persistent piRNA-producing loci.

PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) silence transposons in the germline, and the loci that produce them diverge rapidly between species. Yet, some loci retain both their genomic location and their piRNA production across large evolutionary distances, and the basis for this conservation is unclear. To identify the features that distinguish these persistent loci, we compared piRNA production at orthologous loci in three closely related mouse species, contrasting loci that produce piRNAs in all three species with those that do so in only one. Transposon content and UTR features, often linked to piRNA production, did not distinguish the two groups. Transcription extending beyond gene ends (readthrough) was more frequent at conserved loci, but did not explain conservation once the amount of piRNAs produced was taken into account. Instead, we found that the conserved loci are those that produce the most piRNAs. The same association holds true in human and two other primate species. We speculate that most piRNAs expressed in testis are tolerated molecular noise, and that only the highly expressed minority are likely to be functional.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

Epigenome-informed Polymer Modeling Reveals Chromosome Folding Landscapes across Distinct Genetic and Epigenetic Contexts

Three-dimensional (3D) genome organization is critical for gene regulation, enabling long-range interactions between genes and distal regulatory elements. Genomic structural variations and epigenetic differences can perturb this organization, contributing to phenotypic variation and tissue-specific gene regulation. Prior studies have assessed the impact of these genetic and epigenetic changes on 3D genome folding, primarily using population-averaged features such as topologically associating domains and loops. However, growing evidence from single-cell and live-imaging studies indicates that chromosomes are highly dynamic and exist as heterogeneous ensembles of conformations. Here, we applied an epigenetic-state-informed polymer modeling framework to generate chromosomal conformational ensembles directly from cell- and tissue-specific epigenomic data. The resulting ensembles reproduced experimental Hi-C maps across cell lines and tissue types. Comparison of these conformational ensembles revealed that, although polymer dynamics were conserved across cell lines, their folding landscapes diverged. These differences arose primarily from cell-line-specific chromatin-state interaction networks and were concentrated in rare, long-lived contacts. Furthermore, modeling a TAD-boundary-disrupting deletion without re-optimizing the model parameters indicated a shift in the chromatin conformational ensemble from predominantly insulated to predominantly fused states. The modeled deletion also selectively strengthened active chromatin contacts and differentially disrupted enhancer contacts involving neighboring genes. Finally, comparison of two tissue types from the same donor revealed epigenetically driven rewiring of chromatin-state interaction networks. These findings establish chromosomal conformational ensembles as a sensitive readout of genome reorganization across distinct genetic and epigenetic contexts.

genomics↗