Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/586073

Neurodegeneration caused by LRRK2-G2019S requires Rab10 in select dopaminergic neurons

Abstract

Inherited mutations in the LRRK2 protein are the commonest known cause of Parkinsons, but the molecular link from increased kinase activity to pathological neurodegeneration remains to be determined. In vitro (biochemical and cell culture) assays led to the hypothesis that several Rab GTPases might be LRRK2 substrates. Here we show that Rab10 potently modifies LRRK2-G2019S mediated electrophysiological responses in an in vivo screen, in which each Rab was overexpressed in Drosophila dopaminergic neurons. We therefore tested the effect of Rab10 loss of function on three LRRK2-G2019S phenotypes (vision, movement and sleep) that rely on dopaminergic circuits in both flies and mammals. The knock-out of Rab10 in vivo fully rescues the reduced responses induced by dopaminergic LRRK2-G2019S in visual and motor (reaching, proboscis extension) assays, but the sleep phenotype is unaffected. We show that Rab10 is expressed in dopaminergic (tyrosine hydroxylase positive) neurons controlling vision and proboscis movement, but undetectable in those controlling sleep, indicating that anatomical and physiological patterns of Rab10 are related. Our results support the idea that LRRK2 phosphorylates separate targets in distinct neurons and confirm that one degenerative pathway starts with Rab10. Although Rab3 is another putative substrate of LRRK2, it shows no synergy with G2019S and localises to a different subset of dopaminergic neurons from Rab10. We propose that variations in Rab expression may contribute to differences in the rate of neurodegeneration seen in different dopaminergic nuclei in Parkinsons.\n\nSignificance StatementA key question in Parkinsons is why dopamine neurons die particularly fast in some parts of the substantia nigra. We focused on the commonest Parkinsons-related mutation, LRRK2-G2019S. In vitro assays suggested that neurodegeneration may start by LRRK2-G2019S increasing phosphorylation of Rab10. We found Rab10 in fly dopamine neurons in visual and motor pathways, but not in the sleep system. Rab10 knock-out rescues G2019S-induced visual and movement degeneration, leaving sleep dysfunction unaffected. Thus, LRRK2 activates at least two pathways, one Rab10-dependent, leading to neurodegeneration in vivo. Rab3 is found in a different subset of dopaminergic neurons and shows no synergy with LRRK2-G2019S. We propose that variations in Rab expression contribute to differences in neurodegeneration seen in Parkinsons.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Petridi, S., Middleton, C. A., Fellgett, A., Covill, L., Stewart, A., Munns, J., Kohrs, F. E., Hiesinger, P. R., Wilson, L., Chawla, S., Elliott, C.. 2019-03-22. Neurodegeneration caused by LRRK2-G2019S requires Rab10 in select dopaminergic neurons. https://doi.org/10.1101/586073

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Simple, static, spiking nonlinearities can account for seemingly complex interactions between visual, motor and cognitive variables in the visual cortex.

Neural activity in the visual cortex is driven by the stimulus and modulated by multiple task-related variables, including spatial attention, eye movements, and perceptual decisions. These multiple influences are each typically described as nonlinear interactions such as gain or normalization, raising the question of how these diverse signals can be combined through cellular or circuit mechanisms. Here we address this problem by examining neuronal responses in macaque visual areas V2 and V3 during a visual discrimination task that dissociates spatial attention from motor planning and microsaccadic eye movements. Using a statistical modeling framework, we show that attentional, microsaccade-related, and choice-related influences on neural activity are best explained by a simple additive stimulus-independent input modulation, which manifests as a gain via a spiking nonlinearity. In addition to explaining how interactions between variables might be accomplished mechanistically, this framework also resolves a controversy about the relationship between microsaccades and spatial attention. We find that neither microsaccade direction nor microsaccade-related neural activity accounts for attentional modulation, although these variables are often correlated, leading to apparent interactions. Thus, visual cortex can integrate sensory, motor-related, and cognitive signals through a parsimonious mechanism that preserves stable stimulus representations while supporting flexible, context-dependent modulation.

neuroscience↗

40 Hz visual stimulation increases gamma-band functional connectivity between visual, parietal and frontal regions

Visual stimulation at 40 Hz is being investigated as a non-invasive intervention for Alzheimer's disease. Its neural responses have been reported in regions beyond the visual cortex, and concurrent cognitive tasks have been shown to increase their spatial extent. However, it is unclear whether these responses reflect increased functional connectivity between regions or a common response to the stimulus, and whether a concurrent task changes this connectivity. We recorded EEG from 29 healthy young adults during Regular 40 Hz flicker and Irregular 30-50 Hz flicker, each with and without a target-counting task (2 x 2 within-participant design). Source-space connectivity between visual, parietal, and frontal regions was estimated with the debiased squared weighted phase-lag index (dWPLI). Regular stimulation increased 38-42 Hz connectivity for all three region pairs, with the largest increase between visual and parietal regions (increase in all 29 participants). The increase was specific to the stimulation frequency and was observed with two source reconstruction methods and in sensor space. The visual-parietal increase remained significant after correction for source leakage (spatial mixing between reconstructed sources) and after removal of the estimated stimulus-locked component, whereas the increases in visual-frontal and parietal-frontal connectivity did not. The concurrent task did not modulate the visual-parietal effect. For visual-frontal and parietal-frontal connectivity, the stimulation-by-ask interaction was not significant. These results show that 40 Hz visual stimulation increases gamma-band connectivity beyond the visual cortex, and much of this increase reflects a common stimulus-locked response, and connectivity beyond this response was observed mainly between visual and parietal regions.

neuroscience↗

Feedback Valence, Prediction Error, and the Limits of Computational Attribution in Symptom-Related EEG

Feedback-locked electroencephalography (EEG) responses are often interpreted using model-derived prediction errors (PEs), although signed PE can be strongly coupled to feedback valence in binary-outcome tasks. We revisited a published anxiety-related EEG association using two open probabilistic-learning datasets to examine measurement reliability, predictor separability, and participant-level recovery. In the primary dataset, greater trait anxiety was associated with a larger negative-minus-positive FCz theta response among 46 participants with elevated depressive symptoms after adjustment for depression severity. The association also differed between the sampled depression-symptom groups. The feedback contrast showed useful within-session reliability, but matched delta and P3-minus-N2 analyses did not establish theta specificity. Within participants, feedback valence and signed PE were highly correlated (r = -0.964). Exact-design simulations showed that population-level model discrimination could succeed despite poor recovery of individual neural slopes. Participant-specific learning-model refits recovered overall signed PE more consistently than the within-valence variation needed to distinguish it from feedback valence. An independent dataset reproduced the FCz feedback contrast in untreated and placebo cohorts but lacked trait-anxiety scores. Adding signed PE to valence yielded a small held-out predictive improvement under one reinforcement-learning specification, with limited support across sessions and no comparable support under the dual-rate model or in placebo. Together, these findings support a symptom-related feedback EEG association while constraining its theta-specific and participant-level computational interpretation.

neuroscience↗