Search bioRxivSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/567396

Description and lessons learned from the 2014 Dengue outbreak in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Knowledge, attitudes and bite prevention practices among those with confirmed Dengue

Abstract

BackgroundThe frequency and magnitude of Dengue epidemics have increased dramatically in the past 40 years throughout the tropics largely due to unplanned urbanization, globalization and lack of effective mosquito control. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania has recently experienced Dengue outbreaks that occur with increasing frequency. Currently, only one serotype is recorded. Without adequate vector monitoring and control, it is certain that further outbreaks will occur.\n\nMethods/FindingsA retrospective study followed 100 individuals with confirmed Dengue fever in Kinondoni, Dar es Salaam during the 2014 outbreak. Houses were inspected for mosquito breeding sites and gathered information on Socio-economic Status (SES) and Dengue prevention knowledge.\n\nHigher SES tertile had the most Dengue cases: 53 (55%) followed by medium and lower SES with 33 (34%) and 11 (11%) respectively. The highest number of mosquito breeding sites was also found in higher SES households. Kinondoni wards of Manzese, Mwananyamala, Tandale and Mabibo had the highest number of confirmed cases: 18, 13, 13 and 9 respectively. Each ward has large marketplaces, which may have aided dissemination of transmission to other areas.\n\nThe population remains poorly informed about Dengue transmission: 22% of respondents said Dengue is spread from person to another, 30% did not think mosquitoes spread Dengue and 60% heard about Dengue while in hospital. Knowledge of bite prevention was poor; Dengue mosquito bites outside of sleeping hours but 84% of Dengue patients said that using bednets would prevent vector bites.\n\nConclusionAffluent households are likely to be reservoirs of Dengue vectors having more breeding sites and Dengue cases. Mobile phones whose ownership is high across all social classes seem to be a better tool to communicate information about Dengue. The study established a habitat suitability score, a tool to be used for learning and estimate breeding habitat capacity to be used for vector control before rains begin.\n\nAuthors SummaryDengue fever is a viral infection transmitted by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquitoes causing a flu-like illness that may develop into severe complications such as Dengue haemorrhagic fever and Dengue shock syndrome if the patient contracts two viral serotypes concurrently. There is currently no antiviral treatment or vaccines available against Dengue. Environmental vector control and mosquito bite prevention remain essential to prevent transmission. Due to globalisation and rapid urban expansion, Dar es Salaam is experiencing regular Dengue outbreaks. Without adequate vector control and public awareness, it is certain that these will continue to re-occur.\n\nThe study presents factors associated with the outbreak in 2014. Rich households have more places for mosquitoes to breed with 54% found in these households and the majority of Dengue cases 55% came from higher SES groups that represented a greater proportion of cases than lower and middle socioeconomic groups, combined. The public was ill-informed about Dengue fever: 84% think bed nets can prevent Dengue, and 60% of the patients only became aware of Dengue while in the hospital with the illness. The study established a habitat suitability score, a tool to be used to estimate breeding habitat capacity before rains begin. Scattered containers especially tyres remain ideal breeding sites. The study highlights the need for waste management to avert future outbreaks.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Msellemu, D., Gavana, T., Ngonyani, H., Mlacha, Y. P., Chaki, P., Moore, S. J.. 2019-03-04. Description and lessons learned from the 2014 Dengue outbreak in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Knowledge, attitudes and bite prevention practices among those with confirmed Dengue. https://doi.org/10.1101/567396

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Smear positive tuberculosis and genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis isolates in individuals visiting health facilities in South Gondar Zone, northwest Ethiopia

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB), a bacterial infectious disease, persisted to be a public health concern in many developing countries. However, lack of enough data concerning the public health burden and potential risk factors for the disease hampered control programs in target areas. Therefore, the present study aimed in determining the prevalence of TB and genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis isolates in South Gondar Zone, northwest Ethiopia.\n\nMethodsA cross-sectonal study was conducte between March 2015 and April 2017. Bacteriological examination, region of difference (RD) 9 based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and spoligotyping were used to undertake the study.\n\nResultsThe overall prevalence of smear positive all forms TB was 6.3% (186/2953). Extra pulmonary TB (EPTB) was clinically characterized on about 62.4% (116/186) TB-positive cases. Some of the patients demographic characteristics such as [patients origin (chi-square ({chi}2) value; 62.8, p<0.001) were found to be significantly associated risk factors for the occurrence of TB in the study area. All the mycobacterial isolates were found to be M. tuberculosis. Among the 35 different spoligotype patterns identified, 22 patterns were shared types. The three dominantly identified families were T, CAS and Manu, each consisting of 46.9%, 24.0% and 10.4% of the isolates, respectively\n\nConclusionThe presented study revealed that TB continued to be a public health problem in South Gondar Zone which suggests a need of implementing effective disease control strategies.

epidemiology

Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy and its associated factors among third trimester Malaysian pregnant women

BackgroundDespite perennial sunshine, vitamin D deficiency is prevalent among Malaysian especially pregnant women.\n\nObjectiveTo determine the vitamin D status and its associated factors among third trimester pregnant women attending government health clinics in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.\n\nMethodsInformation on socio-demographic characteristics, obstetrical history, vitamin D intake, supplement use, and sun exposure were obtained through face-to-face interviews. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was measured and classified as deficient (< 30 nmol/L), insufficient (30-50 nmol/L), and sufficient ([&ge;] 50 nmol/L).\n\nResultsOf the 535 pregnant women recruited, 42.6% were vitamin D deficient. They consumed an average of 8.7 {+/-} 6.7 g of vitamin D daily. A total of 80.4% of the vitamin D were obtained from the food sources, while 19.6% were from dietary supplements. Fish and fish products showed the highest contribution to vitamin D intake (35.8%). The multivariate generalized linear mixed models, with clinic as a random effect, indicates that higher intake of vitamin D is associated with lower risk of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women (OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93-0.99). Non-Malay pregnant women had lower odds of having vitamin D deficiency (OR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.04-0.37) compared to Malays. No associations were found between age, educational level, monthly household income, work status, gravidity, parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index, total hours of sun exposure, total percentage of body surface area, and sun exposure index per day with vitamin D deficiency.\n\nConclusionsVitamin D deficiency is prevalent among Malaysian pregnant women. Considering the possible adverse obstetric and fetal outcomes of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy, antenatal screening of vitamin D levels and nutrition education should be emphasised by taking into consideration ethnic differences.

epidemiology

Comparison of National Level Spatial and Spatio-temporal Models of Malaria

Geospatial statistical models play an important role in malaria control and prevention; they are widely used to produce malaria risk maps, which are essential to guide efficient resource allocation for intervention. Although many models are available for spatial mapping, the most commonly used model in the literature is the Bayesian geostatistical model (BGM), which is based on an underlying Gaussian process. To our knowledge, methods such as splines and decision trees ensemble methods have not been compared relative to their predictive skill for country level malaria prevalence mapping. Moreover, as more countries now have multiple datasets collected throughout the past decade, it is critical to evaluate if the inclusion of past datasets and the use of spatio-temporal models improve the prediction accuracy of present spatial distribution of malaria. Here we compare the prediction accuracy of five models under spatial and spatio-temporal settings in five African countries. The five models are stepwise logistic regression, generalized additive model (GAM), gradient boosted trees (GBM), Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) and the BGM. There is not a single best model to predict malaria prevalence on a national scale. The model performances varied from country to country, and from spatial to spatio-temporal setting. In general, BGM, GAM and BART models performed well, with BGM being the most consistent. The inclusion of past data is not always beneficial: the predictive performance of GAM and GBM increased under spatio-temporal setting, but BGMs performance decreased in most of the countries. An accurate depiction of malaria risk is important and statistical assumptions that are suitable for a country does not always fit other countries and a wide range of models and settings should be used. It ensures that we find the best modeling approach possible and can provide additional insight to the spatial distribution of malaria risk.\n\nAuthor summaryMalaria is still affecting hundreds of millions of people every year, and killing hundreds of thousands. As the majority of malaria intervention and control policies are developed at the national level, accurate spatial prediction of malaria risk is important. Choosing the best modeling approach for prediction is not straightforward. Here we compare the predictive performance of five models in five countries, with and without dataset from multiple surveys, to provide empirical evidence on whether there is a single best model for national level malaria prediction, and whether inclusion of past dataset may be beneficial in predicting current distribution of malaria risk. We find that models performances vary from country to country and there is no single best model. Although Bayesian geostatistical model is widely and commonly used in the literatures, its performance is not necessarily superior to other simpler-to-fit methods such as general additive model (splines) and Bayesian additive regression tree. Importantly, we also show that the incorporation of past data does not always improve spatial predictions of current disease risk. Together, this demonstrate the importance of fitting wide range of models as part of the prediction mapping process, instead of relying on a one-size-fit-all model.

epidemiology