Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/549477

Speed, accuracy, sensitivity and quality control choices for detecting clinically relevant microbes in whole blood from patients.

Thornton, J. E.·Watts, G. S.·Youens-Clark, K.·Cranmer, L. D.·Hurwitz, B. L.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Infections are a serious health concern worldwide, particularly in vulnerable populations such as the immunocompromised, elderly, and young. Advances in metagenomic sequencing availability, speed, and decreased cost offer the opportunity to supplement or replace culture-based identification of pathogens with DNA sequence-based diagnostics. Adopting metagenomic analysis for clinical use requires that all aspects of the pipeline are optimized and tested, including data analysis. We tested the accuracy, sensitivity, and resource requirements of Centrifuge within the context of clinically relevant bacteria. Binary mixtures of bacteria showed Centrifuge reliably identified organisms down to 0.1% relative abundance. A staggered mock bacterial community showed Centrifuge outperformed CLARK while requiring less computing resources. Shotgun metagenomes obtained from whole blood in three febrile neutropenia patients showed Centrifuge could identify both bacteria and viruses as part of a culture-free workflow. Finally, Centrifuge results changed minimally by eliminating time-consuming read quality control and host screening steps. AUTHOR SUMMARYImmunocompromised patients, such as those with febrile neutropenia (FN), are susceptible to infections, yet cultures fail to identify causative organisms ~80% of the time. High-throughput metagenomic sequencing offers a promising approach for identifying pathogens in clinical samples. Mining through metagenomes can be difficult given the volume of reads, overwhelming human contamination, and lack of well-defined bioinformatics methods. The goal of our study was to assess Centrifuge, a leading tool for the identification and quantitation of microbes, and provide a streamlined bioinformatics workflow real-word data from FN patient blood samples. To ensure the accuracy of the workflow we carefully examined each step using known bacterial mixtures that varied by genetic distance and abundance. We show that Centrifuge reliably identifies microbes present at just 1% relative abundance and requires substantially less computer time and resource than CLARK. Moreover, we found that Centrifuge results changed minimally by quality control and host-screening allowing for further reduction in compute time. Next, we leveraged Centrifuge to identify viruses and bacteria in blood draws for three FN patients, and confirmed suspected pathogens using genome coverage plots. We developed a web-based tool in iMicrobe and detailed protocols to promote re-use.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thornton, J. E., Watts, G. S., Youens-Clark, K., Cranmer, L. D., Hurwitz, B. L.. 2019-02-14. Speed, accuracy, sensitivity and quality control choices for detecting clinically relevant microbes in whole blood from patients.. https://doi.org/10.1101/549477

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

RoDPAA: A Robust Dissimilarity-Based Principal Angle Analysis Framework for Multi-View Microbiome Data Integration

Multiview microbiome studies profile the same participants across body sites or molecular layers, but integration is hampered by sparse, compositional data, modest sample sizes and methods that recognize only exact sharing. We present RoDPAA (Robust Dissimilarity-based Principal Angle Analysis), a framework that represents each view through any data-appropriate dissimilarity, such as Bray--Curtis, without log-ratio transformation or likelihood assumptions. RoDPAA aligns view-specific signal subspaces through principal angles, captures complete and partial sharing, and tests by permutation how many components are shared, using only eigendecomposition and little tuning. In Gaussian simulations, RoDPAA matched JIVE and MOFA given true ranks, ran faster and alone recovered the shared dimension in every replicate. In two inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohorts with sparse, zero-inflated data, Bray--Curtis-based RoDPAA recovered shared structure that was stable to prevalence filtering, whereas log-ratio-based alternatives were not. Its leading microbiome--metabolome factors, learned without disease labels, were the only ones associated with IBD.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Deducing splicing events from transcript sets with splicelogic

Long-read RNA sequencing captures a greater proportion of full-length transcripts, enabling more accurate isoform identification, discovery of novel isoforms, and more precise differential transcript usage analysis. However, comparing transcripts, whether between conditions or between sets such as novel and annotated isoforms, yields complex isoform changes that are hard to manipulate, summarize, and visualize. This is compounded by vertical integration of some tools, where downstream analysis depends on the specific output of a particular upstream tool. To address this gap, we have developed splicelogic, an R/Bioconductor package that makes transcript-set comparisons biologically interpretable by turning them into discrete splicing events, such as exon skipping, alternative splice sites, intron retention, and alternative transcription start and end sites. We designed splicelogic to integrate easily with existing RNA-seq workflows and tools. The splicelogic functions are modular, readable, and extensible, making it easy for users to adapt core logic to their own custom scientific questions or novel splicing definitions. By obtaining interpretable splicing events from transcript changes, splicelogic enables downstream analyses, including annotation of RNA-binding protein recognition sites, alongside summary statistics and visualization. The splicelogic package is publicly available and distributed through Bioconductor.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Contrastive Learning Improves Generalization on M2OR Olfactory Binding Dataset

Olfaction-based biosensors stand to have profound impacts in fields such as medical diagnostics, national security, and drug discovery. A promising mode of vapor phase biodetection mimics volatile organic compound-olfactory receptor (VOC-OR) interactions with target-specific protein or peptide probes; however, lack of experimental coverage remains a core bottleneck. Current computational approaches aim to improve prediction of VOC-OR binding to reduce experimental burden, and current machine learning approaches fail to demonstrate a level of generalization that addresses current engineering challenges. Here, using the Molecular to Olfactory Dataset (M2OR) and Insect Olfactory Binding Protein Database (iOBPdb) datasets, data partitioning methods and their performance are evaluated on a neural network and contrastive learning framework on such VOC-OR binding datasets, varying: model training, architecture, and structure of the input data distribution. It was found that holding out certain chemical or proteomic motifs from the training data diminished model performance with a two layer neural network model. The model was able to generalize to state of the art performance (0.88 AUCROC) on every data split by applying a contrastive learning objective defined by shared molecular constituents and a stochastic sampler. This suggests the contrastive objective provides a strong inductive bias for neural networks to predict novel VOC-OR pairs. These findings highlight that model performance on pairwise biological interaction datasets can be inflated through identity leakage from constituent overlap, and emphasize the need for more robust evaluation protocols. Furthermore, we show contrastive regularization mitigates dataset degeneracy through enforcement of compatibility in the models latent geometry that may extend to other binder target-datasets where identity leakage confounds evaluation.

bioinformatics↗